• Deme@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Yes, the comment I replied to is technically right in that there are some tiny countries out there. Or they would be, if the rocket in question would’ve been a vastly larger rocket that burned a carbon containing fuel. The New Shepard tourist joyride is tiny for a rocket and its exhaust is water vapour.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Where did they get all the hydrogen? How did they make the rocket. While it may not emit much carbon on launch day, it will have taken a shit load to produce it.

      • Deme@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I was talking about the direct emissions of launching a rocket. The indirect emissions are obviously vastly larger and might as well include everything in the wider economy that enables stuff like this. Just maintaining the necessary industrial capacity is already a huge strain on the planet. That’s what I’m after with these comments. The rich fucker joyride is a largely inconsequential yet overtly visible result of a bloated system hiding in plain sight. The aerospace sector as a whole is just the tip of the iceberg of a global industrial society in ecological overshoot.

        • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Hydrogen is usually produced from natural gas with all the carbon being released as CO². So just the direct cost of making the fuel is already terrible.

      • bravesirthomas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Although I doubt it, hydrogen can be produced using renewables.

        It’s still going to be significantly “greener” than using methane as a propellant, though.