• disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      114
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s what the article states. She’s mandating two weeks of intense discovery, which will lead to contempt of court if they cannot prove they have done everything in their power to return him.

      • stickly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Honest question: if the administration’s defense is shrugging because he’s in another country, doesn’t the judge have an easy layup to shut down CECOT deportations?

        They can’t have it both ways, either follow due process or keep your slave detention camps domestic. It’s not interfering in foreign policy to point out they need to choose.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          39
          ·
          3 days ago

          She did, with an injunction that they are continuing to defy. That’s another contempt of court charge. She has to do this slowly and methodically to prevent giving them evidence of bias when they appeal her rulings. The downside to a just court is the pace. Had we a functional Congress that wasn’t packed with loyalists, this would’ve been over by now.

          • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            The next step is to issue an arrest warrant for Trump, and if the cops are too pussy to do it the Judge can deputize any citizens who volunteer to do it too.

    • SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      How can they be found in contempt when they were never out of contempt.

      They don’t care what judges say. The judges are just NOW finding that out?

      • eRac@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        In the legal system, far more things get reversed due to procedural issues than on merit. Generally, this is a good thing. A judge should not be able to hand out punishment on a whim.

        As with most protections, fascists destroy the ones that limit them and cling to those that benefit them.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 days ago

    The article is actually really badly written because it completely ignores a key point. The Supreme court itself said that the government needed to act internationally. It’s there in the text of the decision.

    In other words, this isn’t the government against some low-level judge. It’s Trump telling the Supreme Court to go to hell. I hope some judges somewhere will actually stand up and lock people up for depriving people of their civil rights, but so far it doesn’t look like any of them have the courage to do so.

    • guest123456@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s the thing though, the judiciary has never had real power. The best they can do is issue decisions which are promptly ignored.

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is when the judge issues an arrest warrant for Trump/Elon and then deputizes everyone who is willing to try to take him in.

    Then they is arrested and we start adding years to their prison sentences for every obstruction.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      Criminal contempt can be pardoned by the president.

      Civil contempt cannot.

      Charge them each a million dollars a day.

    • felixthecat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Unfortunately the only way to arrest a president is the impeachment process. Which wont happen with a republican super majority. Unless you can get Republicans to grow a spine there is no other legal process to hold the President accountable.

      However I’m not sure about those employed by in his administration. But then again if he’s willing to pardon Jan 6th rioters he will definitely pardon people in his administration…

      • LordGimp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        Actually the only way to arrest anyone is with physical restraints. Trump can blather all he wants once the cuffs are on, but hogtied is hogtied no matter how you slice him.

      • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Idk if those rules apply anymore.

        It doesn’t seem like rules apply in this country anymore, and whoever wins the current war will decide what was legal retroactively.

      • WarlordSdocy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        I mean I think at least in theory the court has the ability to use the US Marshalls to enforce a court order. And I also believe they can deputize others to enforce those orders instead in case the Marshalls end up answering to the DoJ instead of the judges.

      • witnessbolt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Sure. But the same is NOT true for everyone below the president. More people might push back on Trump’s illegal orders if they know there’s actual consequences for it.

        The first part is still right. In a sane world, this is where the court starts to enforce that it is a co equal branch, per the constitution.

        But we left the sane world a decade ago so… who knows.

  • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    3 days ago

    This whole case has collapsed into a handful of choices:

    1. Judge doesn’t declare the Trump admin in Contempt of Court (i.e. does nothing). This sets precedent that Trump’s administration enjoys full immunity from the judiciary, officially turning the US into a dictatorship. This is what has been happening for weeks and remains by far the most likely scenario.
    2. Judge declares Trump in Contempt of Court, but is unable to enforce it. This is equivalent to scenario 1.
    3. Judge declares the Trump admin in Contempt of Court and deputizes state police to enforce the ruling and arrest, if not Trump, at least some officials. This would be legal and remains the only constitutional solution, but would almost certainly trigger an armed response from the regime. Democracy doesn’t go down without a fight, but the end result is uncertain.
    4. Pro-democracy factions use illegal/violent means to force Trump to comply (military coup, sudden Luigi’s Mansion remake, etc.). However it would seem that the masks fell off and despite decades of propaganda to the contrary, literally not a single living American is willing to put their life on the line to protect Democracy.
    • JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      The administration will just apply for an appeal to the decision - 6 months - then if it is approved it goes to a one man Supreme Court ruling (18 months), then they appeal again (12 months) and it goes to the full bench (24 months) who will declare its now outside the scope of action.

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Didn’t this already go to the Supreme Court and come back? I think that decision was already made.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        There’s a serious chance they’ll have the guy killed to get the judge off their back without having to be seen backing down, and to show judges what happens when they try to challenge the regime on a deportation case.

        • Revan343@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          Which would definitely be contempt of court when the whole thing leaks because they added another goddamned reporter to the signal conversation about it

          • Draces@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            And then we get to watch Fox News talk about how brilliant and righteous the regime is

    • BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Because they made the poor and uneducated afraid. That’s why all the guns. Fear of that which they do not understand. They were fed endless propaganda about how Trump cares for the working class. Republican Corporate media let them keep their guns as long as they had an enemy to point them at that wasn’t them. Keep them scared and afraid of their allies, their fellow working class.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    3 days ago

    No kidding your honor. The question is what exactly are you or any other judge going to do about it?

    I don’t mean that in a Trump is right kind of way. I mean it in a this is something the judiciary needs to be seriously looking into sooner rather than later.

  • GuyFawkes@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’ve got an idea! Let’s sit around jerking each other off for two weeks while we build a case that Trump will just ignore anyways! Who’s with me (besides the Court)???

  • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Court: issues order

    Trump Admin: flat out says they will not follow the orders

    Court: I don’t think the admin is following my orders.

  • Lucky_777@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    Give them two weeks to do something. We’ll see, then what if they don’t provide? Another 2 weeks? They will just say he is dead or died in transit and it’s out of their hands. Then what happens? Let me guess.

    Fucking nothing.