• SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah people who reply immediately to email are weird. Do they not understand that every mode of communication has a different need of immediacy to reply? If a face to face has the highest followed by phone calls, IM is in the middle and email is right at the bottom together with letters. If I write you an email I expect a response within a few days not a few minutes.

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Just because I reply immediately does not mean I expect a response immediately. If someone emails me when I’m able to immediately respond, I’ll sometimes get the response out of the way right then. But email is asynchronous. I don’t get mad if I respond immediately but then I don’t hear back for quit awhile.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Exactly this.

        I think the people I work with regularly eventually figure this out when they see my reply times varying from 3 seconds to two weeks lol

    • Ibuthyr@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Email is for archival, IM should be banished. It’s completely useless, steals your time, steals your focus, it’s plain shit. I wish we could go back to emails and phonecalls only. People are way more hesitant to call someone, plus it’s super easy to just set a phone to silent.

      I often reply immediately to emails because I want to remove it from my mental load.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Why should I delay my answer because miss princess got her head smoking?
      Think about it: There are persons outside of your 4 homeoffice walls.