The chief of Germany’s foreign intelligence service warned that his agency has “concrete” evidence that Russia is planning an attack on Nato territory.
Bruno Kahl, the outgoing head of Germany’s federal intelligence service (BND), said in a rare interview that Russian leadership no longer believes Nato’s article 5 guarantee of mutual assistance will be honoured — and may seek to test it.
“We are very sure, and we have intelligence evidence to back this up, that [Russia’s full-scale invasion of] Ukraine is only one step on Russia’s path towards the west,” he told a podcast of German outlet Table Briefings.
Kahl qualified that “this doesn’t mean that we expect large tank battalions to roll from the east to the west.”
Kahl said: “We see that Nato is supposed to be tested in its mutual assistance promise. There are people in Moscow who don’t believe that Nato’s article 5 still works.”
[…]
While the war is still confined to Ukrainian territory, the German internal secret service, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV), has warned that Moscow is increasingly extending the conflict to western countries through cyberwarfare and espionage.
Russia has in particular taken to deploying so-called low-level agents to commit acts of sabotage, according to the BfV annual report, which was presented in Berlin on Wednesday. They are believed to have been deployed to plant incendiary devices in parcels, which caused a series of fires in European logistics hubs last year.
“We have noticed that Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine has led to our cyber and espionage defences being increasingly tested,” Sinan Selim, vice-president of the BfV, said.
More like, to test whether the US will follow article 5.
Isn’t the answer to that
quietquite clear today? It’s a no, they wouldn’t.Which is why Europe needs to coordinate on a joint military plan YESTERDAY. EU is capable of keeping Russia at bay on its own, no doubt about it, but they need to get smart about it as soon as possible because we only have a small window of time to pre-empt this.
The problem is that, while the EU has undeniably grown more cohesive and rational, it’s still just “a bunch of countries at the same party,” or at least that’s what it feels like. Putin knows this. Everyone knows this, but few can afford to actually talk about it and risk spoiling the image.
I do agree that we need to present a unified front on this and show that asshole that he can’t swing his weenus wherever he pleases (which, arguably, should’ve been done years ago, but WHATEVER!), but I somehow get the feeling nothing will happen until he actually does something. As though those “oopsies” drones which landed everywhere but Ukraine weren’t enough as-is…
Edit: and if he does do something and we continue wringing our hands figuring out a balanced approach, then we’re fucked.
It is just one point of view based on the limited information. If you check actions of core EU countries, you can see that they are cohesive + joint military exercise are happening quite often.
Said it yourself, “core.” That just means a couple of people at said party know each other pretty well, but there are still more people there.
At this point, I almost wonder if the plan is for Russia to attack the Baltics while the US attacks Greenland, to force Europe into a war on two fronts.
If they were to attack US troops stationed in Europe there would be a chance I guess. But Putin will know to avoid that.
Why would Putin give a shit about that? Trump is more interested in having US troops attack US citizens on US soil.
You know, like they swore they would do.
Because he has basic common sense. The Trump base is quite pro military, American serviceman getting killed by Russia would force Trump to response to it decisively.
Like when we found out Russia put bounties on soldiers and these morons started wearing “I’d rather be Russian than a democrat” tshirts?
No, I don’t think it would be like that at all.
The Russia issue is something republicans aren’t really united on. I’m pretty sure that an attack on US troops stationed in the baltics, for example, would give a lot of ammunition for republicans to push back against Trump on this issue.
They could easily spin it. But I hope you’re right.
Exactly
Depends on the whims of a narcissist. Trump could do that, but it would be in response to some self-referential ego protecting thought process, and increasingly likely to stop as soon as he felt better.
The US is busy getting fascist on their own citizens, all their guns are busy internally.
Haha no they aren’t.
No, i think its more of a general test. I sincerely believe that any form of mobilisation in germany would be followed up by massive protests and calls from the public for the government to step down… especially if german troops would engage in real combat.
The thing is: We have a big german-russian population and still tons of people who are still stuck in the peace movement days of the 60s - 80s… so, i really doubt that we would do more than send our equivalent of “thoughts and prayers” and perhaps some intel.
61% of German men under 50 would be willing to activly fight for Germany, if Germany would be attacked. Ukraine, which has no formal alliance with Germany, got a lot of weapons and money to keep able to defend itself. There are German soldiers in Lithuania permanently to defend the Suwalki gap.
Chances are some German soldiers get killed and that means war. As soon as Germany itself gets attacked public sentiment is going to shift very quickly indeed.
Well… lets wait and see… i still doubt it very, very much.
Would that sentiment still hold if it was Germany that was attacked?
Putin probably knows how nibble around Germany for the start of his next meal. Like eating around the yolk of a panfried egg to save it for last.
I don’t think that sentiment will hold at all.
probably not
Sadly, i am pretty sure.
If it would be a small scale attack (like sinking a german submarine or a drone strike on a container terminal) it would be doubted that if it was a real attack or if it was a false flag action from whoever to force us to attack russia.
If it would be a major attack, like flattening the Hamburg container port or taking a one or more of the german islands it would be the sentiment that we already have lost, that it would be better to negotiate before it REALLY escalates and we lose everything.
Let just say i have not a good opinion of the resilience of many of my fellow german countrymen (and women, and others).
You mean you don’t have a good grasp on mass psychology.
I mean that i have witnessed my fellow germans during Covid… and i spend a few years in the german army, none of both experiences have strengthen my believe in us managing a big crisis, let alone a war.
Covid was a completely different situation, also, here in the north people took it very well (Wat mut, dat mut).
Importantly: Fighting Covid largely meant sitting on your arse. In isolation, bored, for months and months on end. Fighting a war is, psychologically, more like getting together and sewing masks and that worked effortlessly, organically.
You don’t need 100% of the population, just the people in power to make a decision and some people enforcing that. Even if 75% of Germans wouldn’t want to fight, you just need the one in charge to give orders to the next in line and it will travel all the way down the chain of command. No way there will be mass desertion because Russia attacked Nato somewhere.
Well… let’s wait and see.
And that’s the thing, we barely have anyone in our political caste who is willing or capable of making any decision that doesn’t directly and positively affect the contents of their own wallet and/or gives them positive media response in the never ending populist circlejerk.
Covid showed very well how incapable of dealing with a crisis our political caste is. Zero lessons were learned, except about how much brazenly open graft you can really get away with.
Wow. That’s sad. I feel bad for Germany.
deleted by creator