• Walk_blesseD@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Since when is it illegal? Nobody has ever raised any objection, let alone tried to stop me going dogs out to the shops.

    • juliebean@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      i’ve been accosted and kicked out of places so many times for being barefoot: grocery stores, restaurants, a bar, book shops, even a shoe store. i’ve basically been bullied by society at this point into wearing shoes whenever i go out, despite my own preferences. it’s not illegal, basically anywhere, but you’ve been quite lucky to not have gotten any shit anyways.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Illegal I haven’t seen. No Shirts, No Shoes, No Service I have seen all over though. Often times near beaches. Many gas stations and restaurants have them as well. Though I don’t see them as often

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            No shirt, No shoes, No Rump Shaker Coverings, No Service. I assume it just sounded better. Skirts, dresses, kilts, pants, shorts.

            Quick search found this: “No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service” was a response by businesses in the 1960s and 1970s to keep long-haired hippies out of stores and restaurants. There are no federal or state laws to this effect. However, there are laws that allow businesses to make their own regulations. This phrase has become an accepted norm

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          35
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          It probably makes sense for places that sell anything in glass containers (especially alcohol), because all it takes is one dumbass dropping something on the floor and someone else walking through it barefoot to have a liability lawsuit on your hands. Whereas if you put up a sign forbidding that and someone manages to sneak in anyways, you can say it was their fault for violating store policy in the first place.

          • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            26
            ·
            13 hours ago

            One drunken night 15 years ago I remember walking barefoot into a gas station to get cigarettes and the guy behind me told me my foot was bleeding. I found out I stepped on a broken piece of glass and left a blood footprint trail for about a quarter mile. It was on the ball of my foot, so it was the ball and first three toes in blood all the way down the sidewalk back towards the house party I had walked from.

            My friend told me he walked that way the next day he was really impressed at how straight of a line it was in if I was drunk enough to not notice and bleed enough to feel it. Not sure I was supposed to take pride in that.

            • Elvith Ma'for@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Can’t blame you. My wife left with the kids, I stayed at home to do some work. About 5 mins later, I get a call from her, that she forgot something at home. I told her to turn around and I’d await her at the curb in front of our house with $thing. As it was summer, I just went out barefoot, walked to the street, gave it to her and went back in the house again. Only after walking around a bit in the house I noticed bloody footprints on the floor. I managed to somehow step into something outside and not feel it. I wasn’t even drunk…

      • Godric@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Really? Apart from “you must be born on or before this date to buy alcohol”, “No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service” is the most common sign I see in stores

              • juliebean@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                it is!

                my understanding is the the american discrimination against bare feet and the still shockingly common ‘no shoes, no shirt, no service’ signs, started as a way to more discreetly target black folk after the civil rights act, as they were more likely to be poor enough to not have shoes. barefootedness had already had an association with poverty for quite a while at that time, and thanks to the legacy of slavery, poverty has always had an association with black people in america.

                the anti-barefoot crowd gained more steam through the sixties and seventies as a reaction by conservative business owners against the hippie movement.

                so basically, the US’s negative attitudes against bare feet have their roots in racism and reactionary anti-counterculture sentiments.

                here’s an article about this history i found, if you wanna read more.

              • Demdaru@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                8 hours ago

                This rule is ancient. I never seen such signs in my life - read about them in history books tho