Edit: there are some minor mistakes with the title and the text in the meme indicating that it’s Lego, not duplo…

Don’t be pedantic; that’s what ruined Reddit in the first place.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      You do provide a service though. Do the people who own the apartments actively do anything in particular that makes sense for them to own it completely?

      Who do you think would have a more vested interest in running the apartments in a functional and efficient manner, the people maintaining the buildings or the people who see it as one of their many investment properties.

      Socialism isn’t just about what’s fair, it’s also about creating a more efficient system to distribute labour and resources.

    • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      So the condo association here is the ‘means of production’ since they’re providing housing services. Ideally, it’d be owned by the workers (who would ideally also be condo owners) and they’d split any profits evenly.

      • aquovie@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        Ah, Landlords aren’t the evil capitalist class then. They’re just a worker that owns the means of production and splits the profits evenly with themselves.

        • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          Maybe there’s a terminology problem, but I thought each condo unit was individually owned? Like, if you’ve got a tower block, and everybody owns their own domicile within it, it’s a condo, but if they’re owned by a landlord and rented out, it’s an apartment.

          • aquovie@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            It was a tongue in cheek strawman or if you want to be fancy, a pedagogical tool.

            If “providing housing” is a job/service/whatever produced by workers then I, as a theoretical landlord, own some means of production and split the profits with all of the workers: myself.

            It seemed like a funny twist of words.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          They’re just a worker

          “My landlord is a worker”

          “How do you know?”

          “He said if anything breaks in the unit, he’ll fix it”

          “Has he fixed anything yet?”

          “No, but that’s beside the point”

    • MNByChoice@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      You do produce a lack of issue. Like there was an issue, then you make it not an issue.

      What would be the means of production? I am uncertain.

      • Even in communist paradise, we will have building superintendents.
      • On the other hand, owning one’s own home might be the means of production in this sense.
      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        The organization and tools involved in the job.

        So for the condo super “owning the means” could be being part of co-op that manages the building.