• demizerone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    My wife’s cousin is doing chat gpt queries always before making decisions. She is not stupid but not bright either. I keep telling her it’s a algorithm and not AI but all I get a blank stare.

  • cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Wouldn’t “GPT it” be easier/more likely to say?

    I generally don’t use these, but Copilot (in Windows) uses one of them (I’m not sure which) and I’ve thrown a few questions at it when I’m bored. Nothing that matters. We have Windows 11 machines at work. I find AI amusing but I don’t take it seriously, and I don’t use it at home or on my mobile. It’s really not for me.

    I don’t like Grok but they have a good name. I mean I don’t “like” any of them, but I like that one less because of its… the stuff it’s said. Mostly because of who’s been training it. But “Grok it” sounds better than Chat/GPT it and sounds almost as good as “Google it.”

  • bigbabybilly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I use gpt every day of my life, professionally and personally. I won’t ask an LLM anything I don’t already know the answer to. I’ve seen them hallucinate way too much crap. With the Internet at our fingertips, there’s no excuse not to do a little of your own homework and proof what comes out of your LLMs.

    Oh, and remove those em dashes. Everyone knows you don’t write that LinkedIn post full of em dashes, bro.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I won’t ask an LLM anything I don’t already know the answer to.

      Why are you asking if you already know the answer?

      • bigbabybilly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        57 minutes ago

        Various reasons. Pulling specific data out of documents. Lesson planning, based on parameters from clients. Talk tracks for clients who are co-hosting my courses. Several other tasks that I could perform more slowly.

  • Gnugit@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve quite solidly taken to the phrase “Just Web search it” and gently replying “yes, I’ll Web search it” when prompted to “google it”.

    • vodka@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I like using Google as a term for search to annoy Google.

      So I’ll tell someone to use DDG to Google it

      Or Google something on youtube

      Or Google something on Facebook

        • Digitalprimate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Startpage is the business, can confirm. Only default on FF on my work computer though, boo to Safari (and the dumb add on that doesn’t actually add it).

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    And it’s just a few years ago that I complained that most people don’t know the difference between a search bar and the URL bar anymore. I.e. they are incapable of entering web addresses directly.

    • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      This started when phones became somehow less shitty for browsing the web. So now everyone without a laptop/desktop could use it. And then it got even worse when browsers got replaced by search-engine-apps. “I thought google was the internet?”

      • TXL@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m just happy it isn’t IE. And that normos have started to figure out that they can easily look up things they don’t know. But yeah, “nature builds a better fool”.

    • Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Oh shit nice I had no idea this subdomain exists, guess I’ll finally be rid of those stupid ai answers in private windows as well!

  • Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Many people I know are also using LLMs for searching stuff.

    Its just baffling how they can trust a single answer frankensteind together from often unknown sources presented as a fact.

    Jeez we are fucked, aren’t we?

    • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 hours ago

      2 weeks ago I had an issue with my hardware Steam Link setup. For some reason picture would freeze but sound would still go. It is connected over ethernet so I ruled out connection issues. Googling lead me to nowhere. Adding “reddit” to search had no effect. Then I just decided to try chatgpt. It gave me few things I can try and lo and behold, second suggestion was what I was looking for.

      There are things I would rather not ask LLMs. But when I have no clue what to even write in google search bar, I’d rather go for LLM because it can lead me to what I am searching for and from there I can continue my own research.

      • turdburglar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 hours ago

        yeah i feel that, but i also feel the guilt of using 3 glasses of water to cool down the computer that answered me.

        at any rate, please do not use grok.

        elon is cooling his penis computer with aquifer drinking water from the memphis sands aquifer.

        he promised to build a grey water plant, but, y’all won’t believe this… he didn’t. hasn’t even broken ground on the construction.

        also, he’s powering grok with generators that have led to ~74% increase in the shittiness of the air quality in memphis from generators’ exhaust pipes.

        please do not use grok.

    • k0e3@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Is it really that much different from the types of people who would believe the first (often bias-confirming) answer they found on Google?

    • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m one of those. I would prefer to google for results, but current day google is perfectly useless even for very obvious searches…

    • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Doesn’t ChatGPT also use google?

      I tested this whole concept with Mistral AI. It searches the web, aggregates its findings and provides an answer highlighting potential perspectives / different answers with each one providing a link to the source URL. As much as I hate AI, it does work great that way (since the LLM doesn’t have to pull stuff out of its butt).

      • hubobes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Are you certain that the answer was actually from their sources? I had multiple occasions where Mistral/ChatGPT gave me sources and I felt like something was off. I then followed the sources and could not find what they found according to themselves. I then asked them to quote the actual text they used to provide said answer and after drilling them a few more times they concluded that yes, the thing they said was actually not anywhere to be found in the sources they provided.

    • P00ptart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      My 10 yr old figured it out when googles AI couldn’t tell the difference between spiderman: miles Morales and spiderman 2. “Why is it trying to give me trophies for the old game?”

    • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      At least it beats googles results nowadays. At least in productivity. Instead of trying to figure out which results were vaguely congruent with my search terms and not just SEO-shit, I get shitty results instantly. And with the confidence of absolute certainty that 2 prime dunning-kruger-examples would show.

      Clear winner 😁