7ai@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 个月前Philosophy has peaked. Checkmate atheistssh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square160linkfedilinkarrow-up1461arrow-down113
arrow-up1448arrow-down1imagePhilosophy has peaked. Checkmate atheistssh.itjust.works7ai@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 个月前message-square160linkfedilink
minus-squareremon@ani.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·3 个月前 but I still find it morally wrong to have sex with something that didn’t consent to it. That makes it immoral in your framework. But you can simply construct one that doesn’t require consent, then it wouldn’t be wrong.
minus-squarePasserby6497@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·3 个月前Sure, but I can also construct a moral framework in which it’s ok for me to murder anyone I don’t like because my not-mental-illness-sky-daddy said so. Moral relativism is bullshit and can be used to justify anything.
minus-squareremon@ani.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·3 个月前Exactly, you can construct what ever moral framework you want to, sky daddy or not.
That makes it immoral in your framework. But you can simply construct one that doesn’t require consent, then it wouldn’t be wrong.
Sure, but I can also construct a moral framework in which it’s ok for me to murder anyone I don’t like because my not-mental-illness-sky-daddy said so.
Moral relativism is bullshit and can be used to justify anything.
Exactly, you can construct what ever moral framework you want to, sky daddy or not.