• Sordid_Seraphim@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    So many people talking about how they don’t care about who is elected next resounds of the remarkable privelage of someone who doesn’t need to care about the result. Like calling against “”" Blue MAGA"“” and “Vote Blue No Matter Who.”

    I’m a trans person, who exactly are you asking me to vote for? Have you ever seen a republican politician. Describe to me which republican politician doesn’t want to take away the rights of trans people?

    To you they may mean nothing, to me it’s everything and you CANNOT convince me by insulting me. The democrats wish to use people like me as a token, it’s degrading, digusting, and I hate them every step of the way. The republicans want me dead.

    These two sides are different and if you wish for me to vote someone different get someone on stage who gives a shit about people like me and I’ll vote for them under any banner. Until then the future is looking pretty blue.

  • Fierro@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    For anyone who needs to hear it, that’s not an excuse to not criticize whatever your side is.

  • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    This comment section right here is all the proof that there will be no salvation in November.

    Every pig-ignorant savior is so absolutely certain that their ideologically pure solution is the only acceptable way to fix anything that everyone is going to cancel each other out and it’s just going to continue sliding towards the cliff edge.

    Under NO circumstances attempt to learn ANY lessons from parliamentary coalitions who banded together to stop the hijacking of their governments by radical fascists despite sweeping policy disagreements. Everyone keep nitpicking every minute detail, make no compromises whatsoever no matter the costs, and make stupid, pointless, self-destructive, aggrandizing gestures so you can talk down to strangers on the internet, and enjoy the ride to hell.

  • Squirrelknight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve heard so called “liberal” media discuss and condemn Hassan Piker more than I’ve seen them discuss and condemn Trump and all his lackeys combined.

    They’re the definition of controlled opposition.

  • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well this comment section is a fucking dumpster fire. I guess MAGA trolls are back on the menu, bois.

  • Mouette@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Idk for US politics but at least in France change came much faster from outside of the pseudo left party Democat equivalent (PS) rather than inside. By fast I mean 10+ years but still the leftist party that is in best place to win présidentiel election broke all links with the establishment and that how they won popular vote.

  • Kurtismayfield@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Its almost as if these posts are put up to be divisive, and to keep any opposition to the current right wing neoliberal order divided. Huh.

  • Long LIve Luigi @lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    The comments are heartening. The parties are more alike than they are dissimilar. One is a better class of criminal, for sure, but neither is worth supporting carte blanche. There are a handful of elected Democrats who are worth supporting, but the longer they are exposed to the DNC “moderates,” the more they expose themselves to the weakness that most humans succumb to.

    Show me a Blue No Matter Who voter, and I’ll show you someone who willingly gives their time and money to a billionaire who owns a pro sports team that already has ripped off the community they live in for millions of dollars in ballpark deals.

  • Matty Roses@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    BlueMAGA, now as into conspiracy theories as their red bretheren, and for the same reasons.

    I’m sorry you’re worried that the Democrats strategy of doing nothing might not pay off, and that endorsing genocide still is such a loser issue. But that doesn’t mean the people refusing to share your party loyalty over any common sense are part of a conspiracy, foreign or domestic.

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      The time to argue and complain about candidates is during the primaries. When a candidate for a party has been chosen you vote with the party. Out system is the way it is and no amount of protest votes are going to fix it. Do not vote 3rd party in the general election.

    • chaogomu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      This is the way, at least until we get rid of First Past the Post and other Ordinal voting systems.

      Score, STAR, or Approval would all make primaries unnecessary, and also reward people for honestly voting their preferences. Which is sort of why there’s so much pushback against them.

        • chaogomu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          3 days ago

          Germany still uses Ordinal voting.

          But yes, you also have about 20% of any given population that will openly choose the greatest evil.

      • DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        But since the people benefitting from the current setup are the ones who’ll have to agree to change it and create the new system, there is absolutely no hope of ever peacefully ending the current status quo.

        • chaogomu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          Except for the fact that pretty much every single progressive in Congress or on the ballot is in favor of some form of electoral reform.

          But like you said, obviously nothing at all can be done, you know, besides voting for them.

            • chaogomu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              2 days ago

              Do you have enough guns to fight the US military? No? Well neither do I.

              Which is why there are steps that must be followed. And right now those are peaceful protest and voting. Making sure everyone votes.

              The time for violence is likely coming, but it has to be after the election. After Trump blatantly ignores the will of the people.

              • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                The violence in the street is already happening. The violence in the courtrooms is already happening. The violence in universities is already happening. The violence in the legislative chambers is already happening. The violence at the homes of resistant politicians is already happening. Roll over, if you must.

                • chaogomu@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  You sweet summer child, you think you know what violence is. You most certainly do not.

                  No revolution has ever succeeded without the aid of the military. If the left kicks of the violent resistance too early, the military will not side with us, and in fact will join in the hunting us down part of things.

                  That’s why we have to follow specific steps. First is peaceful protest. Second is voting.

                  Third is violence. And if we get steps one and two right, we might not have our homes bombed as we sleep.

              • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                Gentlemen may cry, “Peace, peace” - but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!

          • DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            3 days ago

            And the people who actually control the party, decide what legislation gets a vote, and punish members who go against leadership will never allow it to happen, nor will they allow any of those progressive politicians to succeed them in their positions of power. Progressives are allowed on the party bcs they help keep the left flank in line, but they will never be allowed to hold any real power. That might threaten the Wall St donation gravy train, and the Third Way Foundation assholes who have a death grip on the power structures of the party will kill everyone on Earth before they give up that money.

            • chaogomu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              3 days ago

              Ah, defeatism. And basically telling other people to not even try.

              I’d expect nothing less from .ml

              • DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                Lol, the people insisting that continuing to do the exact thing that got is here is the only viable way to change things accusing others of defeatism will never stop being hilarious.

                Now do the one where you pretend Democrats have passed a bill that helped the working class more than it helped Wall St any time in the last forty fucking years, that’s always a riot!

                • chaogomu@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Did you vote for progressives in the primaries?

                  No? you just want to feel superior by representing the very meme at the top of the page? Sure. Just shut the fuck up until after the election because the rest of us need to be the adult in the room. The simple reality is that thanks to First Past the Post you have exactly two choices.

                  Pro-fascism or anti-fascism. If you refuse to make a choice, well guess what, thanks to FPtP, you’ve chosen pro-fascism. That’s the hell we live in.

                  If you tell others to not vote, then you’ve again chosen the pro-fascism side and are a piece of shit on top of it.

              • BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.mlBanned from community
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                2 days ago

                Somehow not defeatism: We have to vote for the democrats, dont you dare think a better world is possible

                • chaogomu@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Did you vote for progressives in the primaries? Actually I don’t care, the primaries are over, you fuck with the dick you’ve got, not the one you wish you had.

              • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                2 days ago

                Tankies won’t but the effort into voting but want to be perceived as serious to actually be marching in the streets.

                They have some real criticism of the dem establishment, but no real perspective that they are surrendering office to fascism.

                • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  i get called a tankie all the time and i vote in every election from the municipal up.

                  the democrats are not a serious opposition party, many democrats in blue states are essentially just republicans who learned how to not openly say slurs in college (think people like seth moulton)

                  they squat on power and are not credible opponents to fascism, only to thier left do they actually put up a fight.

                  why would they? they have unlimited money and legions of people willing to debase themselves defending any incompetence out of pure team loyalty.

          • DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Nope. I spent a decade working my ass off to do that and worked my way up to being a paid campaign staffer for progressive candidates.

            I suggest you do the same so that you can learn what I did: the people who control the levers of power in the party will allow progressives to be elected, it helps keep the left flank in line, but they will never allow progressives to have enough power to change the fundamental nature of the party as a machine that turns bribes into Wall St friendly legislation.

    • sharps89@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Lemmy users in socialism.ml actually define Putin as progressive (I wish I was joking)

      EDIT: look at them all brigading me below. PUTIN SUCKS and North Korea is an authoritarian shithole!

        • sharps89@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          I would show you, but mods deleted all my comments! Just criticize Putin, Stalin or Kim Jogn Un in the socialism.ml or memes.ml instance and you’ll instantly have -10 downvotes and probably a ban

            • sharps89@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              2 days ago

              He said he would like to see one case of this happening… a comment would demonstrate that

              • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.mlBanned from community
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                No, he said he would like to see an example of an .ml user calling Putin progressive. Are you drunk?

                • sharps89@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Could we please not resort to ad hominem attacks and insults, “Nonconfrontational”? This isn’t Reddit.

                  Logically, I don’t follow where that was specifically asked, but here’s a comment calling Putin’s Russia progressive: https://lemmy.ml/comment/27815508

          • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            lmao pointing out that the US has more people imprisoned than the USSR is not a mossad psyop

            I am glad that people like you get banned

            • BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.mlBanned from community
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              Its awesome how these people can just make up bullshit and never get punished on their instance.
              I suppose thats a universal issue, but its still egregious.

              • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                literally every time someone is like ‘woe is me the tankies got me, all i did was speak truth to power’ i look at the modlog and it’s them insulting people or being a reactionary

              • sharps89@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                2 days ago

                I’ve been banned for stating North Korea is an authoritarian shithole. Is that bullshit, in your opinion?

                • BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.mlBanned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Considering what shows up in the modlog about you, and how you presented the same situation, I’m quite certain you werent just some uwu smol bean who merely said a country was authoritarian. You might have more succes talking about how unreasonable moderation is on specific instances, if you actually tell the truth about what happened.

            • sharps89@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              That was not the comment I was banned for, and you know it.

              80% of that figure weren’t imprisoned, they were on probation! Clearly misinformation when you look at the facts… that upsets Stalinists.

              Have a sense of humor!

              • BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.mlBanned from community
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                You got banned for repeatedly calling things you disagreed with a “mossad psyop” while completely failing to engage with any argument presented to you. You did not get banned for a specific comment, but for you behavior throughout the thread.

      • Pratai@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well, to be fair, they’re a bunch of idiots. So… no need to take them any more serious than you would MAGA.

      • BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.mlBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        I love how you can just make shit up and libs eat it like slop, as long as its about someone they’re preconditioned to hate.

        • Oppopity@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          It really weakens your position too. Because people who aren’t familiar with the issue will see one side blatantly strawmanning and when they see the other side not mentioning that at all, they’ll just awesome the first side is full of shit. Even if their positions are corrects.

        • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I find that .ml can sometimes be questionable, but yeah that sounds like a claim that needs evidence.

          • BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.mlBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            If they ever source their claims they always either point towards

            • a singular incident by a new account
            • someone saying something other than what they claim is being said
            • someone who got banned for their reactionary tendencies
            • a comment that got removed for its reactionary tendencies
            • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yeah, if its common there should be plenty of highly upvoted comments like that, and not just a meme/shitpost either.

        • dreamy (she/her)@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I support voting jackass, just not for genocidal neoliberals and DSA entryists. I know this will be shocking to you, but we have leftist parties in my country.

          Maybe you can form one as well? Is that too much to ask of Americans?

        • BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.mlBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yes, you are right, the alternative to not voting for a genocidal fascist is immediate revolution. Good little lib.

        • DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Russia is doing war, not genocide. Ukraine was doing genocide in Donbass before Russia invaded. (And in the vein of “Jesus Fucking Christ I can’t believe it’s actually necessary to say this, but ShitLibs are so utterly illiterate as to make it necessary”: no, I don’t believe that’s the actual reason Russia invaded. Stopping that genocide was more of a happy accident.)

          The only source for “Chinese Genocide of Uyghurs” is one right wing theocrat in Austria with a self-professed “mission from God to fight against Communism”. He does have CIA contacts, but he doesn’t read or speak a lick of Mandarin. Oh, and a few actual terrorists that the US found convenient to help destabilize China.

          You can look up for yourself the video of Col Lawrence Wilkerson (US intelligence) addressing the Ron Paul Institute and laying out the entire playbook a few years before the accusations started.

            • DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              16 hours ago

              What an erudite rebuttal. You sure disproved what I said with the absolutely no information you provided.

              I assume the fact that you didn’t actually address either point is due to the fact that you know what instead dnwas correct and you’re salty your cable news talking heads haven’t given you the right talking points to get around that?

              • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                16 hours ago

                Sure tankie. Here’s another 50c. Now go away and add that 50c to buy a plane ticket out of Russia before it becomes a Chinese vassal.

                • DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  Yeah, you clearly don’t have any actual rebuttal. I’d guess that you know I’m right and it pisses you off, so you’re lashing out. But I really don’t care very much. If your next response doesn’t actually address anything I’ve said, then you can fuck off to the block list and everyone who reads this later can know for absolutely certain that you agree I’m right, you just hate that fact.

        • dreamy (she/her)@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          Lmao, do you actually think that “Uyghur genocide” means that China is carpet bombing Xinjiang 🤣

          “Genocide” in China’s case means cultural genocide. It stands in for forced assimilation. China isn’t bombing every single school and hospital in Xinjiang and massacring hundreds of thousands of Uyghur people dumbass. And I don’t support the treatment of Uyghurs in China, nor do I support Ukraine’s invasion.

          And this comment was really eye-opening. You American libs have made the word ‘genocide’ so fucking meaningless that you just throw it around for every single thing, including regular invasions. You didn’t watch the video I sent you of an actual genocide, did you?

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Issue with that tactic is that it’s actively being used to justify Chuck Schumer’s “for every big city liberal we alienate, we will gain 3 to 4 hillbillies from the rural area” schtick, which is costing democrats elections and us (the world) the real progressive movement.

    • Matty Roses@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, do NOT do this. This just gives a boundary to the left and none to the right of the Democratic Party.

      Always vote for “progressives” (or ideally socialists) in the primary. If you’re in a red state, consider even voting and running in the GOP primary instead.

      If your candidate loses the primary, VOTE AGAINST THE PARTY IN THE GENERAL. Make it apparent that they either move to the left, or they lose.

      And - crucially - join and form organizations that publicly state they will do exactly this.

      • GraniteM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        But why be partisan? Why not vote independently, after an earnest scrutiny of the candidates and issues, for the welfare of the people as a whole? It sounds good and it would be very nice if it would work. It would also be nice if pi were exactly 3.000 instead of a bothersome 3.14159 plus.

        There are two reasons, one moral and one practical. The practical reason is this: You simply cannot be effective in politics unless you join in the process of compromise and conciliation whereby free men merge little groups into big groups until they accomplish a government. If you are not partisan you are on your own, everybody is out of step but Johnny, and the chances that you can have any effect on how this country is run are 140,000,000 to one against you.

        –Robert A. Heinlein, Take Back Your Government

      • ramble81@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        VOTE AGAINST THE PARTY IN THE GENERAL

        No, no, and no. Shit like that is how we got Trump. Stupid protest votes are not what’s needed right now.

        Does it suck? Yes. Do you just have to hold your nose and do it? Yes. But voting against things or not voting is what put us in this situation.

        The primaries are the time to push things left.

        • DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Not just no but hellfuck no.

          If you’re a safe vote for the party, there is no reason they should ever even consider what you want when deciding on policy.

          The primaries are the time to push things left.

          The General is the time to punish sliding right.

          Protest votes are exactly what’s needed right now.

          Shit like that is how we got Trump

          This statement tells me that you still don’t understand why Trump was a viable candidate (remember, wannabe fascist strongmen have run in the Republican primary since forever. They didn’t used to get the time of day from GOP primary voters).

          Shit like voting Blue No Matter Who even after the Clintons sold the party body and soul to Wall St is how we got Trump. Ending Welfare as we know it is how we got Trump. Running on codifying Roe and abandoning the idea before the inauguration party hangovers have cleared is how we got Trump. Refusing to prosecute torture under Bush II and extending the Bush Tax Cuts is how we got Trump. Passing “insurance reform” that didn’t create a public option and did give private health insurance corps 5 consecutive quarters of record profits is how we got Trump. Using Ukraine as a pawn to fight a proxy war with Russia is how we got Trump.

          I could go on, but if you refuse to see it with all that then there’s no hope for you anyway.

        • Matty Roses@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Shit like that is how we got Trump. Stupid protest votes are not what’s needed right now.

          It literally is not. Go do the math yourself - there is literally not ONE state where protest votes, even counting right wing ones, made up the difference Kamala lost by.

          The problem is that people, RIGHTFULLY SO, see that there’s no effect to their vote, and don’t bother voting for Democrats.

          You want to fix that, you clean out the Democratic Party. And the way you do that is exactly how I describe above. You want to not have to fight the leadership, you’re going to continue to get the same failure you have for over 2 decades now. And that is how you got Trump.

          • TheOakTree@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            I think you underestimate the number of people who protest voted by refusing to vote at all, which is neither an actual protest vote nor the same type of problem. Not that I think it would have been a guaranteed tipping point, but it sure would have made things a bit closer. Compound that with one of the (designed) effects of the electoral college (devaluing voter turnout in high-population states), and you widen that gap much more.

            “America will have the most lethal military” and other signalings in favor of status quo imperialism sure did kill any interest for many left wingers to vote, and anecdotally I know many of my left-proclaiming peers took that as reason to forego the polls altogether.

            • Matty Roses@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              20 hours ago

              I think you underestimate the number of people who protest voted by refusing to vote at all

              So what you’re actually trying to say is that people not voting is how we got Trump? Because calling not votes protest votes is just beyond confusing.

              You’re not incorrect - but honestly, blaming the voters rather than the candidate seems insane. Especially since 7 million more voters HAD come out in 2020, and the Democrats avoided even the appearance of a primary in 2024.

              but it sure would have made things a bit closer

              horseshoes and grenades

  • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Until there’s someone that accurately represents GenX and lower, people are just gambling by voting for the next geriatric senior that’s gonna go fucking senile, shitting themselves and having agendas that don’t benefit anyone of the current age of the actual workforce. We’ll keep getting someone who’s focused on social security and wars rather than the housing crisis and the AI workforce replacements that are pushing out people who dedicated time and effort and went into crippling debt becoming proficient at a six figure or top five figure earning positions, only to consider switching trades.

    How about we get a president for the people, under 50 and doesn’t fucking hate us.