• jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    There needs to be many more of these. I know, I know, people are holding out hope for the Iowa caucus, but it’s really pointless.

    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-primary-r/2024/iowa/

    It’s a race to see “who gets to lose to Trump by 40 points.”

    Trump 54%

    DeSantis 18%

    Haley 12%

    Ramaswamy 6%

    Christie 3%

    Scott 2%

    Burgum 1%

    Hutchinson 0%

    Anyone in single digits needs to drop out. Or put it another way, you could combine the support for all the other candidates behind a single person and they would still lose to Trump by 8 points.

  • roguetrick@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    “The RNC’s clubhouse debate requirements are nationalizing the primary process and taking the power of democracy away from the engaged, thoughtful citizens of Iowa and New Hampshire,”

    Bold strategy you had there cotton.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    North Dakota Gov.

    Doug Burgum announced Monday that he’s dropping out of the race for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination.

    “The RNC’s clubhouse debate requirements are nationalizing the primary process and taking the power of democracy away from the engaged, thoughtful citizens of Iowa and New Hampshire,” Burgum said in a statement bashing the rules that kept him out of the most recent debate.


    The original article contains 64 words, the summary contains 64 words. Saved 0%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I rarely give the gop credit but if they’re taking power away from Iowa and New Hampshire they at least get props for that. Terrible places those

  • Davel23@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is like when you see the announcement of some celebrity’s death, and you didn’t even know they were still alive.

  • Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    You mean all those millions he burned flooding NH and Iowa with TV ads and giving $20 gift cards in return for a $1 donation didn’t pay off?

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      giving $20 gift cards in return for a $1 donation didn’t pay off?

      That seems…vaguely illegal? I can’t say how, though. But it seems wrong to be able to pay people to donate to a political campaign. Like it’s trying to get around campaign finance laws.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Spending $19 to get $1 doesn’t immediately seem to make sense, but one of the debate threshholds was to have a specific number of unique donations.