BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 years agoAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square115fedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down12
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneBluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square115fedilink
minus-squareretrieval4558@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoI’m not sure what your point is here
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoMy point is that the whole premise of “consent for existing” is bogus.
minus-squareretrieval4558@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoAnd how does that relate to angels?
I’m not sure what your point is here
My point is that the whole premise of “consent for existing” is bogus.
And how does that relate to angels?