• TeraByteMarx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Doing the the thing in direct opposition to what an authority is demanding is like a trauma response or something.

      • yamper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        moving your data from your domestic authoritarian to a foreign authoritarian isn’t the gotcha you think it is

        • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The data is stored on US soil, so whatever they are able to gather, the US government is allowing it. Which means… all social media. So, ban all social media then if it’s such a risk, right? Or… I don’t know… maybe make an actual data privacy law so no one can steal and hoover up your precious data?

        • IngeniousRocks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Look m8 IDC how authoritarian they are, if China wants to see how much brain rot I can get through in an 8 hour period that’s fine, it’s not like they’re an authority over me

          In the US, especially for some marginalized groups (trans folks mostly right now) there’s an active push by the govt to make people hate us, I don’t want THAT authority to have any of my fucking data, especially when analysis of my scrolling habits could tell them when I’m most likely home or whatnot.

          Given the choice between an authoritarian and an authoritarian, I’ll take the authoritarian who can’t exert power over me thanks

          • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Except they’re not just both authoritarian; they’re both capitalist. So TikTok (or whatever) will just sell your data to brokers and it’ll eventually end up in the hands of Americans who would visit your home.

            • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Are you somehow not aware that Google/Facebook/Twitter literally do the same thing? Wouldn’t it make more sense to create a data privacy law so that everyone benefits? I don’t understand why that’s so hard to grasp for some of these folks.

              • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 hour ago

                It would make more sense to use alternatives to those social networks. Yes, it is still bad when Americans do it.

                You and I have practically zero control over privacy laws. We’re living in an oligarchy, not a democracy.

      • TeraByteMarx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Yeah absolutely. Grassroots organising is good but so is being angsty on the internet. Like how a few people were talking about voting as a tool for harm prevention on an individual rather than systemic level before the election. Whatever works to make you feel less powerless is a good thing