Years earlier, she had asked a boss if he would let his children fly on a plane with the litany of flaws and non-conformances he was urging her to “pencil-whip”: “Cindy, none of these planes are staying in America, they’re all going overseas,” he retorted, much to her horror.

  • RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.cafe
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I hope a third player balances things out. I don’t care if it is Bombardier, Embraer, Comac or some other company. Just need the Airbus-Boeing duopoly broken.

  • filister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I am genuinely curious why on Earth airline companies are still buying Boeing planes. The last 5-10 crashes all included their planes and it is a mystery why their shares didn’t tank more.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Airbus has a backlog of 8000 jets. Order one today and it will take a decade before it arrives. So airliners basically have to keep their current fleet flying.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Planes they already have can’t really be grounded immediately without replacements. Buying replacements takes time and money. Negotiating contracts also takes time. Pre existing contracts tying a company to boeing probably exist in some places. There’s probably some incentive to not drop a somewhat strategic business on a whim. And maybe some people believe that boeing will start pulling their head out of their ass at some point.

      And all that would be a hindrance assuming there is a will to stop buying boeing planes, AND move to another, potentially foreign business like Airbus.

    • Rose@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Organisational inertia. Planes are expensive, and getting them and qualified personnel to fly and maintain them is a long and complicated process for the airline companies (and the governments supporting the airlines).

      They get the news about Boeing being crap, but they can’t just reverse a decision in one day, because the decision to go with Boeing was made years or decades ago.

      • torrentialgrain@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The real reason is that airlines don’t want a monopoly where there’s only one relevant manufacturer that can dictate airframe prices to them. That’s why you will see almost every airline trying to at least somewhat balance the scales between Airbus and Boeing.

    • mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago

      they probably already bought too many of Boeing planes before these accidents happened. So what are they gonna do, put a bunch of Boeing planes in the back room and use Airbus? Still when i fly, I avoid Boeing like a plague. The problem is there are very limited Airbus flights for my route.

      • mx_smith@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The company I work for did end up hiring many of the temp engineers from the company in that article, and the ones hired are some great coworkers, but there were many we didn’t hire.

        • torrentialgrain@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Listen man, I personally go out of my way to not fly on Boeing planes, but we have no idea what happened to the Air India flight. And frankly, what we know about QC problems with 787 airframes is nowhere close to giving you an immediate double engine rollback right after rotation.

          Of course, as always on Lemmy, people who know very little about a topic will accuse those with more nuanced opinions of being paid off because they’re not validating their simple world views. It’s like discussing people in a crack house.

          • eskimofry@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            oh nuanced! you’re so sophisticated! first don’t dismiss others as if they have no idea. acknowledge you may not be the smartest in the room. Otherwise you come off as a clown.

            • torrentialgrain@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              No, I will continue dismissing you as having no idea of what you’re talking about because that’s clear to anyone who’s even half educated about aviation.

      • Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        58
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        You know why the 2008 financial crisis happened? Banks sold assets under the assumption that their credit rating was intact.

        Sure, I would afford Airbus every benefit of a doubt, but sorry, Boeing is building a track record which none of us should ignore. My speculation is warranted.

          • yesman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Of course a suicide would have advance knowledge of their own death. It’s not unusual for suicidal people to lie about their own mental health. Especially to their closest loved ones.

            What you point out could only support a vague suspicion; a motive to look for compelling evidence. Hanging a whole murder conspiracy on evidence this thin is not the product of critical thought.

            • eskimofry@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 hours ago

              username checks out. You should leave the critical thinking to people who aren’t born yesterday

                • eskimofry@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  critical thinking is when you can differentiate a multimillion dollar corporation defending itself vs. pilots and crew who have nothing to gain and a lot of risk coming out about how bad their ex-employer screwed up and swept it under the rug. this sort of stuff is not uncommon from corporations.

                  I am more likely to believe that Air India was screwing up because they have a history of this. If a lot of people complain about smoke coming out of places it shouldn’t be, then i would listen to them rather than the owner who pretends everything is fine.

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sounds like the planes Boeing sent to India had foreign object debris rattling around inside conduits.

    That’s a ticking time bomb for random electrical failures, such as both engines shutting down right after takeoff.

    • EndRedStateSubsidies@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Black Rock basically owns the entire stock market. Even the best intentioned companies eventually have to cave to fiduciary duty to shareholders.

      • kayky@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        That’s why going public is a sign the owners no longer care about the business and only care about fleecing us as much as possible.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Black Rock owns absolutely fuck-all. It only manages the 401ks of normal people like you and me, and STOLE OUR SHAREHOLDER VOTING RIGHTS.

        • blazeknave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah these headlines always grind my gears. Even the equity they don’t steal, they leverage as if their own assets. They’re fucking mine and yours.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        No, it really doesn’t. Assets under management (not owned) 11.5 trillion, while the American stock market alone is worth around 50.

          • theneverfox@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Yes. Unambigiously.

            What would you rather have, one person with a ton of power making decisions, or abstract it out over a group and diffuse all responsibility?

            Both are bad, but one of them has a (likely not morally great) person at the top, the other has lots of robber barons sharing ownership and collectively demanding line go up

            A person isn’t usually dumb enough to fire half their workforce, because they know their bread and butter comes from that workforce. A consulting company advising the business and shareholders at the same time can easily do such stupidity for short term profits

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Boeing is straight fucking scum, but that was the strangest plane crash I’ve ever seen. (LOL, like I’m an export.) The truth will out.

      • kayky@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Thanks for sharing this.

        Aside from the promotional material in the video, it’s nice to see something that shows the raw footage instead of some talking heads babbling over an edited cut.

      • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 day ago

        I remember that, if I remember correctly, it was a tank, and they suddenly had a massive CoG shift to the back of the aircraft, causing the plane to pitch up and stall.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah… The article is conflating power failure with engine failure. It was a very odd plane crash, and it didn’t appear that they had power failure. It looks like they lost thrust on both engines, which is really rare in multiengine aircraft.

      • kiwifoxtrot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        It seemed to take forever to start to rotate and the nose was pointed up the whole time. I would have expected to see the nose point down to prevent a stall.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yep, another Boeing mystery crash where everything stopped working at once.

      I’m kinda suspicious that the critical moments weren’t actually missing from Jeju Air’s black boxes when they were delivered to the US.

      • torrentialgrain@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The 787 has backup power for black boxes while the 737 uses an outdated design that does not, so there shouldn’t be missing data hopefully.