• Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      the standard wikipedia skin is plenty information dense, while also actually being readable.

      yes i’m cranky because the glorification of the old web is largely nostalgia and completely ignores things like accessibility

      • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        Both true, but for totally different reasons, right.

        Early Internet was kinda bonkers because it was disconnected and unregulated and anonymous and nobody yet understood UX design so every site was different, yet always cluttered and overwhelming.

        Modern Internet is bonkers because UX patterns and user behaviour is so understood and homogenised that every site is basically the same simplified interface, along with the same dark patterns that manipulate user behaviour to maximise corporate profit, rather than trying to give users what they actually want.

        The old type of bonkers was far more preferable.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      i mean yeah, it’s like comparing the first car to a modern kei car, there’s been some obvious improvements despite the fact that most cars are oversized and way too sleek

      the early web looks like shit, the standard modern website is hidden behind 4 layers of ads, but a modern website that isn’t shittified is pretty fucking great.

  • hansolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Yeah, this was sort of the “corporate-ish” color scheme and web design template back then for websites. Tons of things looked like this. Facebook looked like this for a decade or more. Large banner images took too long to load and this looked “professional” because it looked like corporate letterhead.

    Xerox used red, but similar layout to some degree.

    IBM’s website in 2002

    Random website from 2002

    • Øπ3ŕ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Additionally, it looks a lot like Friendster’s default.

      (Hope you’re well, ol’ Tom. Wherever you are. 🥲🖖🏼)

    • GraniteM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      I adore the blessed people who write up the Simple English entries.

      Here’s the opening paragraph from Quantum Mechanics in Simple English:

      Quantum mechanics explains how the universe works with things that are even smaller than atoms. It is also called quantum physics or quantum theory. Mechanics is the part of physics that explains how things move and quantum is the Latin word for ‘how much’. A quantum of energy is the least amount possible (or the least extra amount), and quantum mechanics describes how that energy moves.

          • ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Difficult explanations of complex subjects that may not be aligned with the statistical word pattern distribution of the corpus of a dead web.

            It’s not impossible that this exact paragraph could be generated. But it was more likely crafted by someone who both understands the subject matter on a comfortable level at the very least, and who understands what parts of it are intuitive enough to create a scaffolding of knowledge that are distinctive to this topic.

            I don’t think I could have come up with anything that doesn’t use the word iota a half dozen times and then falling backwards on myself trying to get across the idea of how energy could not exist in measures that are not multiples of a minimum iota of energy (and explaining that it’s just how it is, no I don’t know how that was measured, etcetera etcetera)

    • ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      I do miss having languages listed on the side by default. I felt like it gave some depth to how important or culturally isolated a subject can be. For example, a short article available in 30 major languages, a long article available in 30 major languages, and a long article only available in like 3 languages would all feel just a little different.

      English is not my native language and a lot of subjects I like (or fixations I may have, knowing Wikipedians) just exist in the realm of English. So these long long pages that don’t exist in many languages have a particular vibe to them.

  • guldukat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Member when the Internet wasn’t profitized? Member when popups were only on porn and warez sites?

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Pretty cool. Everyone can’t seem to get that “bonkers” can be a good thing

    Also super neat that Retrozilla exists.