Sean “Diddy” Combs was accused in a lawsuit on Wednesday of gang-raping a 17-year-old girl in 2003, marking the fourth sexual assault allegation lodged against the producer in recent weeks.

The plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe, alleges that she was flown on a private jet from Michigan to Combs’ recording studio in New York, where she was raped by three people, including Combs and Harve Pierre, the president of Bad Boy Entertainment.

According to the suit, Combs and his associates plied her with “copious amounts” of drugs and alcohol. The suit alleges that Combs raped her over a bathroom sink while she went in and out of consciousness, and that Combs then watched as a third man also raped her.

      • interceder270@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        48
        ·
        1 year ago

        Absolutely, but she was probably willing at the time.

        I don’t think most people are above having sex with rich and famous people then trying to receive money if they think they can get it. It’s just human nature.

          • interceder270@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            If I was 17 I could easily see myself having sex with a rich and powerful lady.

            I don’t think I would try to get money out of it cause I’m not a shitty person though.

            • soren446@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              A 17 year old isn’t an adult per US law. They legally cannot consent. Even if a 17 year old is “willing”, the adult in the situation should not fuck the 17 year old. Doing so not only makes the adult a shitty person, it makes them a criminal who raped a child.

              • interceder270@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I wasn’t talking about the law.

                I had sex at 17 with an adult and have 0 regrets. It’s pretty normal. I think I would’ve had more regrets if I refrained from doing it because people like you think that’s what I should do, lol.

                To put things into perspective and why it’s always good to talk specifics, I was 17 and she was 20. I guess she’s a shitty person who raped me and should be in prison, lol. We ended up being together for years, it was a great relationship :)

                But I guess from your ‘logic’, if this occurred in a different jurisdiction (or if I had waited 2 months for my 18th birthday,) then she would be off the hook for any and all judgement.

                It’s funny watching you people always pivot to the law as though every law is just and people are good based on how well they obey laws.

                • soren446@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  people like you

                  I was raped as a child so yes I am very against people having sex with one. I frankly don’t care how your relationship turned out. Legally, she raped you. Besides that, a 20 year old is in a vastly different stage of life than a 17 year old. I’m glad you turned out fine, but congrats on being an exception.

                  There’s so much more to the situation anyways besides age. Power dynamic is a HUGE part of consent. It’s the same reason why a rich 40 year old is still a shitty person for fucking an 18 year old, even though it’s legal.

                  I can’t believe you are putting this much effort into defending the fact that an adult gang-raped a child.

        • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, having sex with people of certain ages is illegal for a reason so it doesn’t actually matter if she was “willing” if she was under the age of consent. Also, drugging a person removes their ability to make an informed decision to consent so again, even if she did agree to it, her consent wasn’t valid on that point either. In other words, she wasn’t capable of consenting so, ya know, rape.

          • interceder270@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not talking about convicting the perpetrator. Please stop assuming, lol.

            Legally speaking, there is no ambiguity.

            But in reality, there is. If you can’t understand that, it’s probably because you don’t want to.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You know, everyone keeps saying “the worst part is the hypocrisy,” but I disagree. I think the worst part was the raping.

      (I feel kind of bad making this joke in this thread, but on the other hand… Norm. So…)

  • Hyperreality@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Like the Snoop Dogg case, I assume this will also be dropped sooner rather than later.

    It’s very hard to prosecute these historical cases, and going against someone this famous is doubly horrific for the victims, so I doubt he’ll ever see justice.

    Hope she at least gets a payout. And that 50 cent goes ahead with his documentary about it all, so the guy is thoroughly shunned for the rest of his life.

    • theangryseal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m with you on this. Evidence should be required before any person on this planet is subject to infamy, time in a cage, or death.

      The investigation should be quiet until evidence is collected that is sufficient for a charge in the first place.

      I don’t know this man, I’m not a fan of his work, there is no bias in me for or against him. When we’re talking about upending a persons life, evidence should be everything.

      • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Makeing the accusations public can help gather converting evidence. People will know if they have some information in support or defence of the allegations that they can come forward.

        It also makes it easier for others that have been a victim of a similar crime by the accused and his associates. It’s likely if this crime happened, it happened more than once and to many victims.

  • pan_troglodytes@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    he’s undoubtedly guilty, but it’s been 20 years - why didnt she come forward earlier? the statute of limitations has probably lapsed

  • interceder270@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    50
    ·
    1 year ago

    Eh, I’m dubious. This sounds like she had a good time and now she sees she might be able to get some ‘compensation’ for it.