Israel’s government approved on Sunday a proposal by Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi that mandates any government-funded body refrain from communicating with Haaretz or placing advertisements in the paper. The proposal was approved by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The decision, according to the government’s explanation, is a reaction to “many articles that have hurt the legitimacy of the state of Israel and its right to self defense, and particularly the remarks made in London by Haaretz publisher, Amos Schocken, that support terrorism and call for imposing sanctions on the government.”

The proposal did not appear on the government’s agenda published ahead of the weekly cabinet meeting. The Attorney General’s office, unaware of the intention to bring the proposal to a vote, did not review it at all and did not present its opinion, as customary. The resolution was presented to ministers during the discussion without any legal opinion.

In a speech at the Haaretz conference in London last month, Schocken said “the Netanyahu government doesn’t care about imposing a cruel apartheid regime on the Palestinian population. It dismisses the costs of both sides for defending the settlements while fighting the Palestinian freedom fighters, that Israel calls terrorists.”

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Pulls advertising? Why would a government advertise in a news paper? Do they have new products coming next year?

    • Jack@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 minutes ago

      Next year, genocide v2.0.0! More efficient, more deadly and with twice the US support!

    • azuth@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      There are legitimate uses like health information campaigns (vaccination campaigns, anti smoking campaigns) and other informatio campaigns.

      Advertising is probably a misnaming.

      • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The paper will still sell the spaces as advertising regardless of whether it’s an advert of a public announcement from the government, so advertising is probably right.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      One of them, and also the most left-leaning. The Times of Israel and Jerusalem Post lean right, and are generally supportive of Israel and its genocide.

      Edit: I should also note that these are the English-language publications. They have others in Hebrew and other languages, but you don’t see them posted in English-language communities for obvious reasons.

    • DolphinMath@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Nope. It’s a prominent one, but by no means the “main” media outlet. It’s also largely in opposition to Netanyahu and his coalition.

      Source:

      As of July 31, 2023, a TGI survey indicated that Israel Hayom, distributed for free, is Israel’s most read newspaper, with a 29.4% weekday readership exposure, followed by Yedioth Ahronoth, with 22.3%, Haaretz with 4.8%, Globes with 4% and Maariv with 3.9%.[1]

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I wonder where Haaretz will relocate to Meduza-style when it’s impossible to continue operating from within Israel.

  • RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I mean… they’re both wrong.

    Schocken said “the Netanyahu government doesn’t care about imposing a cruel apartheid regime on the Palestinian population. It dismisses the costs of both sides for defending the settlements

    No lies detected.

    while fighting the Palestinian freedom fighters, that Israel calls terrorists.”

    If Schocken is referring to Hamas, then he’s out of his mind. Freedom is the last thing Hamas wants for Gaza or Palestine.

    • Doorbook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Say it as many time as you want, history will call them freedom fighter.

      When you live in area with no freedom of movement, no freedom of food options, no freedom of trades, and you fight, that it is a freedom fighter.

      Your people called movement in South Africa terrorist, called Irish terrorists, called Indian terrorists, called natives terrorists. Called everyone challenge you or support them terrorists.

      But at the end history called them freedom fighter.

    • small44@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Sure they just want to die fighting the IDF just so the IDF kill Palestinians while none of our countries does anything to stop this genocide