• usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s worth noting that in countries like US, it’s really only things like beyond burgers and impossible meat that cost more. It doesn’t require eating those for a plant-based diet nor are people typically eating those every meal, is why plant-based diets generally have lower costs

    Compared to meat eaters, results show that “true” vegetarians do indeed report lower food expenditures

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921800915301488?via%3Dihub

    It found that in high-income countries:

    • Vegan diets were the most affordable and reduced food costs by up to one third.

    • Vegetarian diets were a close second.

    • Flexitarian diets with low amounts of meat and dairy reduced costs by 14%.

    • By contrast, pescatarian diets increased costs by up to 2%.

    https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2021-11-11-sustainable-eating-cheaper-and-healthier-oxford-study

    • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh yeah I 100% spend less on food as a vegetarian, because black beans/lentils are such wonderful cheap sources of protein.

      But sometimes I want like the premade like meat crumbles or burgers, and those cost more usually.

      • Match!!@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        But do you spend less because you’re vegetarian, or because you don’t have options for spending money at fast food / restaurants?

        • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          38
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean a pound of beef costs $4.

          A pound of raw lentils like a $1.

          Lentils are more calorie dense.

          Lentils are more protein dense.

          Black beans are in similar camp.

          Rice and wheat products are cheaper per calorie, but lack the protein.

          So yeah, it’s just cheaper to be a vegetarian, even with massive beef subsidiaries. But veggie patties are still more expensive because of processing and they are smaller batches.

          • scala@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            To add to this as a vegan of 10+ years. To supplement the lack of protein, I use pea based protein powder for a meal. And add hemp seeds for other meals/snacks during the day.

            We occasionally get the processed grounds/meat substitutes only when they are on sale. Which would be 2lbs for $6 for a gardien/beyond/impossible alternative to animal flesh in pounds.

              • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’ve always had issues with lentils but my diet is very Midwest American lol. The only time I’ve had good lentils is when they’re masked as much as possible in heavily spiced curries or similar.

                Aren’t they already used in a bunch of processed foods as filler?

            • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              … okay you got me there.

              But the veggie tech to make meat likes is getting better, so hopefully soon!

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah people really don’t believe me when I talk about how much I save by being a low fish pescatarian. A can of beans is cheaper than equivalent beef or chicken as are mushrooms. Peanut butter sandwiches are a cheaper lunch than lunch meat ones. And I’m not hurting for protein because beans are full of the stuff

    • TheFriendlyDickhead@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I realy don’t get why people eat those meat subsidies. They are realy not that good and unhealthy too. Cooking a meal just with vegetables and other stuff can taste realy good, is healthy and cheap at the same time.

      • WetBeardHairs@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Probably because Americans were raised on a super meat heavy diet. Meat burgers. Meat casseroles. Meat sauces. Meat everything. Fake meats make those recipes achievable for vegetarians and vegans who long for mom’s home cooking.

        • 4lan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is only a recent thing historically. Government subsidies and lobbying from the meat industry, not to mention letting agricultural corporations create our food pyramid, got us to where we are today.

          We have been led into an unhealthy lifestyle for the profit of a handful of billionaires.

          Take a look at places where people live above 100 yrs regularly. They aren’t shoveling beef down there throats like Americans are. And we die 20 to 30 years earlier on average

      • KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Want to hear some mind-blowing information? Not everyone likes the stuff you like, you’re not the barometer on what is good or what is unhealthy.

      • MickeySwitcherooney@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You want the real reason in a thread jerking off vegetarianism? Here goes:

        1. Meat tastes great.
        2. It gives me a sense of fullness that plants rarely do (except beans).
        3. It’s a better protein source.
        4. The iron, B12, etc. in it are more easily absorbed.
        5. Every brand of fake meat I’ve tried tastes terrible.
        6. It makes me feel the best mentally compared to eating other foods.
        • 4lan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Why is it that countries that don’t eat red meat as much as Americans live far longer than we do?

          Okinawans live well past 100, and are doing physical activity into their 90s. Americans are falling apart by the time they turn 60, dead before they hit 80.

          I hope the flavor is worth the colon cancer!

          • fatalError@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not American myself, but I can think of a few factors besides meat:

            • less stress
            • less polution
            • less processed food, be it meat or not
            • less sugar
            • less sedentary lifestyle
            • genes

            Nutrition alone won’t get you to 100. Having a diverse diet keeps ypu healty, but there are many factors that impact health. I do agree that meat is overused in general population, but can’t really force the vegan/vegetarian lifestyle onto an omnivore specie.

          • mob@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            While moderation is the key to everything, and I wouldn’t be surprised if cutting out red.meat is a lot healthier for the consumer

            Feels like you just randomly made something up here by comparing some random outlier stories you’ve heard.

          • FatCrab@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Impossible and beyond taste delicious in respective appropriate dishes. Dunno wtf you’re on about. Also a lot less prep and clean up to toss a frozen patty on the grill than cook a bunch of veggies. The downside is that it isn’t particularly healthy-- at least on par with a red meat burger. But the idea that they all “taste bad” is just dumb and contrary to what clearly a ton of other people experience.

  • Hello_there@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reminder that farmers can spend something like a dollar per cow per year to allow their cattle to roam through public lands to cause erosion, shit in streams, spread giardia, and give farmers reasons to kill coyotes and wolves.

  • That Dutch guy@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Here it’s not just that.

    The raw resources and production costs of oat milk is like, €0.30 per 2 liter.

    They sell it at €2.40.

    Healthy is capitalism here.

    • x4740N@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Doesn’t production of not milk use a ton of water and have am environmental impact

      One of the trends I have noticed with vegan users online is that they neglect to mention the environmental impacts of their own alternative products

      • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oat milk is just oats blended in water. The research is minimal. The marketing is where they put most of their money.

        • jasondj@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Most retail nut milk is actually mixed with a variety of gums and other texture enhancers.

          Fresh, homemade oat milk is actually really easy to make by that process, but store-bought oat milk needs to have consistent flavor and texture/mouth-feel. So there is a bit more that goes into it.

          This is also true of other non-dairy milks. That’s why I only use Trader Joe’s or Westsoy shelf-stable soy milk for making yogurt. No gums.

        • TJA!@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think there is a huge difference in the thing you are describing and e.g the oatly barista.

          There are a lot of oat milks that taste very different or not at all. To get the right taste and consistency, you need some research.

          • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re the only one talking about niche/specialty products though. Not denying that those products require extensive research, but I doubt that those products alone are responsible for the considerable markup on the typical alternative milk products, which truly are closer to “oats blended in water”, and probably make up a majority of sales.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Plus vegans will pay anything in order to imagine themselves as being better than meat eaters.

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you learn how to make your own patties from scratch it’s pretty cheap - or to save time you can do what I do and eat beans directly from the air fryer 🤤

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I actually just rinse off canned beans, spray them with vegetable oil, toss em in at 400F for 8-12 minutes, then shake them in a baggie with salt and spices. Or mix them in a bowl with hot sauce. Or use them as a topping for rice. Or throw them in stir fry. Or sauteed onions and bell peppers, then put them on tortillas.

        God damn I love air fried beans

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            All kinds!

            Airfried garbanzo beans are great as a salty snack (generally I like to use a sweet chili seasoning) or sauteed with onions and peppers and fajita seasoning and then served on soft tortillas. Airfried pintos are great as a salty snack (chili lime or nooche is best for them) or sauteed with corn and onions and taco seasoning, and then topped with fresh tomato and lettuce and put on crunchy tortillas. Airfried black beans are great as a salty snack (just straight with salt and pepper) or just drenched in hot sauce and eat em with a spoon.

            I wasted so much of my life thinking I didn’t like beans because I’d only ever had nasty baked beans from school lunches. 😞

    • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sorry corn farmers, this is about people food. Growing fuel doesn’t really count.

      Growing corn that is only usable as animal feed counts as part of how beef industry is being propped up by the government.

      So yeah… I think only one or two corn farmers will be left in the chat after that.

        • Grumpy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re all referring to corn subsidies.

          If you grow corn with subsidy and then sell that corn as livestock feed to cows, then you’ve indirectly further subsidized beef.

          Though… this viewpoint is partly misleading people. Corn stalks and pith which humans can’t eat and need ruminant animals to process is what gets fed to them. We don’t always feed corn kernels to cows en masse, though many farms do. If they can find a buyer for the kernel for other consumption (human, fructose syrup, etc), they will sell it that way as it is more profitable. So even if it wasn’t subsidized and we only produce high priced corn for humans, we’d still feed the stalks and pith to cows.

        • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Correct, but the vast majority of corn subsidies are to grow corn not meant for humans to eat. They are to grow animal feed, or ethanol.

          So the first category I count as subsidizing the meat industry, since it exists purely to make raising live stock cheaper. The second category doesn’t really impact food.

  • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Never say America can’t afford to feed its people. It can, it just prefers to prop up failing and immoral industry instead.

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Depends. If you are eating non processed vegetables the costs goes way below even burgers.

    • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh yeah for sure! Just sometimes I wanna go to a place and order a similar looking thing as the people around me without paying a ton more XD

    • teuniac_@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And beans. And lentils. And peas.

      Also, opting for the burger options doesn’t have to mean eating a huge quantity of them.

  • SexyTimeSasquatch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh man, staple crops are subsidized waaaaaayyy more heavily than beef. Some of this grain goes to the beef industry as feed, so it is indirectly supported by taxes. But the reality is that the soy, barley, beans, or whatever else is in that veggie burger are subsidized directly and more extensively.

    • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Where in the WORLD did you hear that bit of propaganda?

      https://agriculturefairnessalliance.org/news/2020-farm-subsidies/

      https://scet.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/CopyofFINALSavingThePlanetSustainableMeatAlternatives.pdf

      https://www.aier.org/article/the-true-cost-of-a-hamburger/

      https://www.ewg.org/news-insights/news/2022/02/usda-livestock-subsidies-near-50-billion-ewg-analysis-finds

      I can’t even find any source saying more money is spent on any crop than on beef. It seems like it’s totally made up. The numbers vary because it’s hard to pin down, but I can’t find a source saying anything besides “most subsidiaries go towards beef and dairy”

        • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          41
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think you should read more carefully what that chart is showing.

          Corn for example is purple and gray mostly.

          Purple = live stock feed gray = biodiesel

          Soy is mostly purple, so most of it goes towards feeding live stock.

          So most of the subsidiary is just being spent to make it cheaper to raise live stock.

          • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Just wanna point out that it’s “biodiesel and Industry” specifically because ethanol is added to almost all gas and more.

            Ethanol is trashing engines and producing more waste via dead engines, all while providing jack shit for actual cleaner energy. The corn lobby landed ethanol requirements and it’s never going away now that they’ve found that revenue stream.

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Also grains are subsidized to support the beef industry because feeding beef beef byproduct had predictable results.

        • Windex007@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t want to speak for them, but one can interpret crops subsidized for the purposes of livestock feed AS a subsidy for livestock. If you look at the sum of the purple sections (livestock and feed), it’s the largest.

          But you are right: buddy’s own chart does show a larger direct subsidy for corn than direct subsidy for beef.

          • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            You are correct, because barely any actually goes to corn we eat. Those subsidies exist just to make it cheaper to raise live stock. So while direct subsidies are higher for corn, it’s so high purely to help raise live stock. Just because we “can” eat corn doesn’t really impact the fact that we aren’t, it’s mostly live stock eating the corn the subsidies are paying for (And biofuel)

            • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yup, here in Iowa the vast, vast majority of corn is known as “cattle corn”, and as described it’s used for cattle (and biodiesel, and pigs). Most farmers only grow sweetcorn “for fun”, as a side thing compared to the huge subsidies for cattle corn.

        • Pipoca@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pigs and chickens don’t eat air, you know.

          70% of US soy becomes animal feed. Some of the rest is used industrially, or becomes biodisel. Relatively little US soy becomes soy sauce, tofu, etc.

          Soy subsidies, in practice, mostly function as a chicken and pork subsidy.

          You’ll notice that we heavily subsidize animal feed crops like corn and soy, and spend much less money subsidizing fruits and veggies, nuts, and other legumes like black beans or lentils.

          • federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Soy subsidies, in practice, mostly function as a chicken and pork subsidy.

            i think there’s a case to be made that it’s actually a corn subsidy more than chicken or pork.

          • federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            70% of US soy becomes animal feed.

            almost all soy is pressed for oil. the industrial waste from that process is the vast majority of what is fed to animals.

    • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Many of those types of crops used for feed aren’t really aligned all that well. Corn for instance isn’t going used so heavily in a plant-based diet as it is subsidized (corn is the most subsidized crop in the US). There is also separate food-grade and feed-grade soybeans. 90% of US soy production is going to feed (and not to mention a good portion of the other 10% is going to soybean oil which is not super helpful for a plant-based meat)

      90% of U.S. soybeans produced are used as a high-quality protein source for animal feed

      https://soygrowers.com/key-issues-initiatives/key-issues/other/animal-ag/

      Further, they are still getting massive amounts of direct subsidies

      The Department of Agriculture has spent almost $50 billion in subsidies for livestock operators since 1995, according to an EWG analysis.

      By contrast, since 2018 the USDA has spent less than $30 million to support plant-based and other alternative proteins that may produce fewer greenhouse gases and may require less land than livestock.

      https://www.ewg.org/news-insights/news/2022/02/usda-livestock-subsidies-near-50-billion-ewg-analysis-finds

      Also worth mentioning that beans are not particularly highly subsidized unless you are counting soybeans mentioned earlier.

  • Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Beef is more nutritious though.

    So giving subsidies for that means more people can afford good nutritious food.

    • Blackrook7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I read that veggie burgers/ processed vegetarian foods have more human DNA in them than traditional options. Plus beef is delicious and nutritious.

      • Pipoca@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you knead bread by hand, it’ll have some human DNA in it from e.g your skin cells. It’s almost impossible to cook or process food while preventing it from getting literally any human cells into it, because humans are shedding cells and DNA literally all the time. You can wear gloves, hairnets, and frequently mop up, but eliminating the problem entirely is hard.

        Both a vegetarian burger and a beef burger are probably going to have more human DNA in it than either a steak or a pot of black beans would.

  • lnee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes I could stop eating a pound a day but keto and vegetarian don’t mix well

  • waow@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why is vegan lingo so infantile? Veggies. You can cram you veggies up your asshole. I’m having a burger.

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Really? That’s the angle you’re going for? Lmao you’re offended by the word “veggies”, a word nearly universally used by nearly every English speaker? Uh oh, looks like your fragile masculinity is showing

  • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Don’t give a fuck. Tax the rich, then we can worry about what I eat.

    Veganism is class warfare.

    • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Americans earning less than $30,000 annually are more likely to identify as vegetarian. Nine percent of this group say they are vegetarian, a higher percentage than is true of Americans in the two higher-income groups. Differences in levels of veganism among these three groups are not statistically significant.

      Gallop poll