• MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    If this might be a euphemism for billionaires fighting or controlling wider society, there would be at least 1000 rows of pawns.

    • PushButton@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      And half the white pawns are capturing the black pawns because they are “cops”.

      Good luck winning that game.

  • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I don’t think it would be particularly fun.

    Sacrifice a tower (I forgot the English name) to get access to a corner, then get the queen in the lower left/right corner within 3 moves.

    Then pick up the pawns one after the other from behind. The pawns themselves cannot move quickly to the other side because they need to keep a “triangle” formation for safety which requires time to build up.

    • Pringles@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I’m not sure a sacrifice is even needed. You just need to get the queen to the backline and wreak havoc.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        15 hours ago

        If they stay in formation you can always force a sacrifice. The pawns will always capture at least one piece.

        • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Yeah, but you can kill off like three elites towards one side and you’ll have open access to get behind the pawns with a queen or rook and just lay waste unchecked.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Yeah, that’s what the first comment above was saying. The one I responded to was wondering if a sacrifice is necessary, and I’m pretty sure it 100% is. It’s still trivial to win, but you do need to lose a piece.

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Yeah, there are ways it could be done, but only if the other player makes a horrible mistake. You wouldn’t leave an opening like that where the queen can move. Maybe with queens, bishops, and knights combined you could force an opening. I don’t know. It seems unlikely though. I guess a key exploit would be that they have to always move forward, but you can stall forever. Maybe that allows you to exploit a gap.

  • drath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Seems way too stacked in favor of black. In fact, I feel like it’s a forced win in like 30 moves or less. Can someone knowledgeble plug this into fairy stockfish or something to confirm?

  • tetris11@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    surely only the 4 front black pawns can advance, all other pawns are locked in place by the polarising media owned by the elite

    unless the 4 white pawns at the back become queens and can advance in any direction, because they’re glamourous trendsetters from wealthy backgrounds who also want to take down the elite

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Is this a commentary on how some of the pawns get to the end and become Queens, thus perpetuating the cycle?

  • Ace@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    There are loads of variants of chess like this. There’s a similar variant to this called Horde chess where white has no pieces but 36 pawns instead, and black has a normal setup. But there are some quite fun/whacky variants on e.g. www.chess.com/variants.

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think that amount of pawns is pretty much what you need to make it winnable. Maybe a few less if you take black’s pawns away. Pretty sure this one, as presented, is unwinnable, which… kind of undermines the point they’re trying to make.

  • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    24 hours ago

    And if a pawn gets promoted, it’s a class traitor and becomes your opponent’s piece?

  • Otter@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    24 hours ago

    What happens if one of the ruling class pieces gets behind the pawns, couldn’t they pick them off slowly?

    • notabot@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Pawns can be promoted to queens when they get to the other side, and when the elite pieces get past the pawns they get promoted to ‘media’, and can slowly, but surely, pick them off.