• Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why do people feel this way?

      I’m genuinely curious as I’d think having a wider swathe of coding experience would be a good thing wouldn’t it?

      I don’t work in fields that use coding expertise, I drive a forklift so I’m out of my wheel house when it comes to coding.

        • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          NGL if I saw a job listing that said, “Don’t have experience in a specific field,” I wouldn’t apply even if I didn’t have experience in the field specified because my assumptions for why they’d say that basically are the reasons you said.

          Or that they would want someone they could under pay for the position, but that’s more specific for what the job is and what they don’t want you to know beforehand.

          Edit: Fixed wrong wording

      • PaperTowel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Java in a large way has been eclipsed by most other languages, and developers kind of have a way of making fun of old technologies, like a lot of the same jokes are made about PHP which is still very popular but outdated. In reality Java is also still incredibly popular and knowing it is certainly a benefit. It’s just a collective joke.

      • amtwon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If it’s a job that requires high-performance/low-level code (which seems to be the case from the other qualifications), this is probably their way of filtering out people who have primarily worked at a higher level where you don’t need to worry about the nitty-gritty details

        • nxdefiant@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I can almost guarantee that job post was written by a recruiter who had some engineers in a call. The recruiter probably said something like “What about Java? I hear Java is important” to which the engineer(s) likely jokingly responded “Oh, no, please no. MINIMUM POSSIBLE JAVA. Yeesh. Ideally none.” … and the recruiter took that literally.

      • gornius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Java used to lack many features to make the stuff you wanted it to do, so most Java programmers adapted design patterns to solve these problems.

        Honestly, older versions of Java are utter garbage DX. The only reason it got so popular was because of aggressive enterprise marketing and it worked. How can a language lack such an essential feature as default parameters?

        So, anyway after the great hype Java lost its marketshare, and developers were forced to learn another technologies. And of course, instead of looking for language-native way of solving problems, they just used same design patterns.

        And thus MoveAdapterStrategyFactoryFactories were in places where simple lambda function would do the same thing, just not abstracted away three layers above. Obviously used once in the entire codebase.

        Imo the only really good thing about Java was JVM, while it was not perfect, it actually delivered what it promised.

  • frobeniusnorm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Ruling Javascript and Python programmers out would be more sane imho. Java sucks, but at least its typed and doesn’t implement weird semantics.

    • anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Had to work with a python programer on a small java project (in uni). I passed some (handcrafted) strings in an Optional to be explicit an first thing he does is check whether they are empty (sending on empty strings would not have been problematic). Also he had compilation errors on his branch that lasted over a week. What python does to someone.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        That guy was shitty at Python, then. Python is all about EAFP instead of LBYL.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Easier to Ask Forgiveness than Permission” vs. “Look Before You Leap.”

            In other words, in Python you should just write the code to do the thing and then put an exception handler at the bottom instead of cluttering up your function with guard code everywhere.

      • Elderos@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I worked under a self-proclamed Python/JavaScript programmer, and part of the job involved doing rather advanced stuff in various other typed languages like c# and c++. It was hell. The code review were hell. For every little tiny weenie little things we had to go through “why coding c++ like it is python” is a very bad idea.

        What is crazy about developers who exclusively work with scripting languages is that they have no conception of why general good practices exist, and they often will make up their own rules based on their own quirks. In my previous example, the developer in question was the author of a codebase that was in literal development hell, but he was adamant on not changing his ways. I’d definitely be wary of hiring someone who exclusively worked with scripting language, and sometime it is less work to train someone who is a blank slate rather than try to deprogram years of bad habits.

        • naught@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Are you referring to Python and JS as scripting languages? The two most popular languages on the planet? Ones which are capable of building almost any kind of app imaginable? Surely you don’t apply your limited experience with a single dev to a group of millions of developers doing extremely varied things, right?

          • Elderos@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Python and Js are by definition scripting languages in the classical sense. I am not using the term in a derogatory way and I myself learnt programming this way as a 90s kid. No offense but I think you took my comment way too personal.

            • naught@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              What is the “classical” sense? What are you implying when you say they are “scripting” languages? What you are imparting to me is that they are less-than other, real languages. I don’t take personal offense, but I do take issue with the mischaracterization and implication that those languages are somehow less serious or less broadly useful.

              No hard feelins! (:

          • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Kinda sounds like they’re adamant about not changing their ways in response to things not working as they expect.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d change this slightly - the problem isn’t exclusively working in scripting languages, but dynamically typed ones. There are people who write great code in Python (with typing) and in Typescript, and they usually can work well in other languages too. But people who don’t type their programs are in my experience simply bad developers, the way you describe.

            • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ah, good!

              I feel like there is a fundamental difference between developers with a data-centric perspective, and a function-centric perspective.

              The function-centric one is about adding functionality, and it’s what developers start out with. You have functions that do things, and if requirements change or the thing should be re-used - no problem, I can quickly add a new toggle parameter here or bolt it on over there. I’ll be done in 5 minutes, no problem!

              Then, over time, you learn that functionality isn’t that interesting or difficult. Instead, the hard parts are the ones concerning the flow of data through your application. What do I know about the shape of my data in this part of my application? What can I be sure of regarding invariants over there? This forces you to build modular software without interdependencies, because - in the end - you just build a library that has small adapters to the outside world.

              I like scripting languages a lot, but it’s way too easy to become “good” at that style of programming, and the better you get at it, the harder it will be to actually move forward to a data-centric perspective. It’s a local maximum that can trap people, sometimes for their whole career. That’s why I try to look at typing experience when evaluating candidates for positions.

  • Troy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe they want to avoid java coding patterns. FactoryFactoryGenerator kind of stuff. Maybe they want to teach their own java coding patterns and want someone coming in with a blank slate so they don’t have to unlearn habits. Maybe they’re tired of diploma mill programmers applying and are using this as a resume filter tripwire.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Definitely. Horror story time.

      We had an outside contractor bring us some code once that was thousands of lines of Python to do a very simple job. I was perplexed. I dove in to figure out what the problem was, and somehow I was looking at the most Java-esque Python code I could imagine. What’s worse is that he implemented his own “Java style” property getters and setters for all the Python classes, which obviously aren’t needed because you can simply access properties directly. In the end I took an 80 line snippet of his code (which actually did the work we needed), swapped out all the getters and setters, and deleted all the rest.

      • BaskinRobbins@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can always tell when someone’s been a career contractor because they never adhere to any of the established patterns/styles in the codebase.

        • gribodyr@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I disagree. Good career contractors should learn to write in the code style of the project. And the real pros do.

      • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is pretty common with outside contractors.

        We just come in, say we’ll pay them x dollars and they give us code that passes the test. But that code will not at all align with any prior patterns.

        I absolutely know I’m guilty of it when I do freelancing. Sorry.

      • Troy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not to say that python coding habits are the best either – certainly they’re terrible when translating outside of python (most of the time). And even within python, someone who is used to with only the base modules will write it differently than writing PyQt and still completely different than someone doing numpy code… because the styles of coding of the underlying system change your coding mode. Like, my variables are all CamelCase when doing user interfaces with Qt because it makes sense there, stylistically.

    • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Definitely the first. I work in ML, and I find for instance people with background mainly in c# to be the least fit for my field, particularly if they have long experience. So I understand this kind of requests

  • riwo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    reading this just gives me the biggest imposted syndrom and reminds me of how underqualified for any job i feel, even after my software development apprenticeship

    • naught@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t feel that way. This is a highly specific role with a ton of not-necessarily-connected tech. Python, C++, Rust and calling out Java? Strange. You don’t need to know any of this stuff to be successful. If you just know javascript, that’s enough for many, many roles.

      Youll find that if you understand the patterns you’re using in JS, you can apply them to many other languages. Other languages will have different syntaxes and maybe slightly different patterns, but you can always apply what you know, which will make it easier to add more languages to your arsenal.

      You’ll feel like you have no idea what you’re doing for a long time, but all the while you have picked up a ton of knowledge and experience that you will still probably discount. Just be eager to learn and don’t sell yourself too short.

  • xlash123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Damn, that sounds like a cool job. I would like to do more Rust at work, but alas, everything here is either Python or Java.