• Vaggumon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    6 months ago

    Wife was hired in 2014 for a position that was designed to be remote. They changed things in 2017 and tried to make her come into an office 2.5 hours away, 5 days a week. She’s legally blind and doesn’t drive, a fact they were fully aware of and had no issues with when they hired her. She tried to argue multiple times, and it just ended up going in circles with several managers getting pretty insulting to her. So, she quit, and eventually decided to contact a disability lawyer to inform the ex-employer she would be suing for discrimination, and ADA violations. Because they said some pretty stupid things in emails and voicemails. They ended up offering a nice sized settlement. She found another WFH job that paid 3x what she was making at the old place, with a higher level position and more closely fits her education. She’s much happier with how things turned out for her. The position has been on various job sites for over 3 years and doesn’t look like it’s been filled since she quit, though I can’t say that for sure.

    • jelloeater - Ops Mgr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      They think we’re cattle, but cattle won’t eat the rich.

      I have always told folks that I managed, that I’m nothing without them. Yea, I have a MBA as well, but man, are alot of those business folks short sighted to a fault. Like lack of empathy and foresight.

      If your KPI’s are based around having a knowledge worker in a chair in a room, your business should die.

      Plain and simple.

        • mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Cows will also chomp down on meat and little birds if given the opportunity. I grew up on a ranch herbivore doesn’t mean vegan like peeps seem to think it does. If they feel like they’re low on a nutrient and have opportunity they’ll nom on anything. No this isn’t pica either.

      • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        My boss is awesome. He realizes that his job is mostly to make sure we’re able to do our jobs effectively. It really feels like I’m working with him, not for him, which is how it should be.

        • edric@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Same. My manager works in another country and he told me that it doesn’t matter where I work from because from his perspective I’m a remote employee wherever I sit.

        • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          A manager’s job is to ensure efficient use of resources among other things, which includes filtering the amount of noise coming down on the workers so that they can focus on doing what they’re good at.

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Same, my manager contacts me a handful of times throughout the year, the rest of the time he trusts I’m doing what I am tasked to do. We had a company wide meeting at head office requiring travel for everyone, the schedule was on my kid’s birthday. I conveyed that I would be missing the bday, and they shifted meeting a few days to accommodate. Not all corporations are heartless slave drivers

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Good

      You should absolutely sue when your rights are violated. It is not ok for an employer to discriminate based on disability.

      • lad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m sure they don’t even understand that it was a discrimination, judging by the fact that they went on and left a lot of evidence of their stupidity

    • MonkRome@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      My sister in law is blind in one eye, but because she has one working eye she has no disability protection as far as I know. She still can’t drive because she has no depth perception and it’s very dangerous. It’s made navigating going to work difficult over the years, often working the same place my brother did so he could drive her. Luckily her current employer works with her and lets her work from home. But a decade ago no one would have dreamed of letting her work from home.

        • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah, but here in the US, if you can work even the simplest job you shouldn’t qualify for disability! That just encourages people to enjoy communism! These literally half blind mfers need to get off their ass and get to work, the lazy sons of bitches! Don’t they love freedom?

          • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            This is wrong, because you’re talking about disability insurance in a comment thread about disability discrimination.

            Disability is very broadly defined for the purpose of disability discrimination laws, which is the context of this comment chain.

            Disability is defined specific to a person’s work skills for the purpose of long term disability insurance (like the US’s federally administered Social Security disability insurance). Depending on the program/insurance type, it might require that you can’t hold down any meaningful job, caused by a medical condition that lasts longer than a year.

            For things like short term disability, the disability is defined specific to that person’s preexisting job. Someone who gets an Achilles surgery that prevents them from operating the pedals of a motor vehicle for a few weeks would be “disabled” for the purpose of short term disability insurance if they’re a truck driver, and might not even be disabled if their day job is something like being a telemarketer who sits at a desk for their job.

  • whodatdair@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Yup, they started to force me to drive to an office where none of the people I work with are, now that’s the only place I do work for them.

    Used to think about and work on projects after hours if I found them interesting or realized a solution I hadn’t thought of. They’ve shown me they don’t care about my comfort, so I don’t feel the need to care about their problems either. The work will be there tomorrow.

    They’re so divorced from reality that they think we’d just give up extra hours of our lives for commuting and keep up the same work output. Fuckin nope, going switch to doing the bare minimum it takes to keep you signing checks.

  • brax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yup, my work pulled the same Bullshit. I can work from home and we all worked from home through COVID… But now suddenly I can’t

    So, there’s been a few times where the power’s gone out or something has happened that needs us at a remote location. They send the team home. The rest of the guys willingly go. I stay back and remind them that “gee, sorry. You guys have made it abundantly clear that I can’t work from home. All those times I had to take personal time… So yeah, no. I’ll just hang out here I guess until everything comes back up 🤷‍♂️”

    • lad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Makes me think that with the hybrid they expect to have the best of both worlds, while in fact it will likely be the opposite.

      Besides, with a mandatory fixed amount of days per quarter it gets soooo bullshit, it’s not hybrid it’s just barely glorified office work

      • brax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Especially when the “hybrid” model involves more days in office than at home.

        I guess execs don’t work when they’re at home and can’t handle not getting distracted, so they just assume the same for everyone.

  • damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    My SO was told to travel to office every day of the week, only to sit in zoom meetings because all of their team is elsewhere.

    Reaaaal good use of everyone’s time and our non-renewable resources.

    • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Don’t forget that it’s also effectively a pay cut due to the added expenses and time lost in commuting. They should ask if the company is going to at least pay for the maintenance of the car if they aren’t going to pay for the time spent commuting.

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Also the time spent getting ready for office appearances and prepping lunches (or the cost of buying lunches away from home).

        • Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          We are required to show up one day a week, but my employer usually buy breakfast and/or lunch. It’s a decent meal, not a shitty half slice of pizza.

          None of us dress up. Not the bosses, the lawyer, no one. We sit in the conference room looking like it’s finals weeks. No one cares, and we get more done.

          • neomachino@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I do something similar, I’m on a dev team of 2 and a while back we started going in once a month for a “planning day” where we spend a couple hours in person planning out our month and spend the rest of the day talking to the teams who actually use our software to get feedback and ideas. At first the owner would take me and the other dev out for lunch but we’ve turned it into a whole office thing. So usually the whole offices shuts down for about 2 hours for a nice free lunch when we come in. One day a bunch of us went out for mini golf after lunch on the bosses dime. Another month a couple of us played old Xbox games and smoked cigs in the basement while we “brainstormed”.

      • ramble81@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        You know the answer, so why even ask? Just makes you look foolish. Brush off the resume and start looking. They won’t learn.

  • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s sad that this is considered malicious at all. Seriously, either working from home is a risk for your company or it isn’t, there’s nothing in between.

  • MrShankles@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    I work night shifts. My manager one time called me around 2pm to ask me something menial and waking me up (as I was still sleeping for my next shift at 7pm).

    So naturally, I called him at 2AM when I was at work… because I had an “urgent” question about a work policy lol. He got the picture, and that shit never happened again

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    It really saddens to me see how many managers out there treat their subordinates terribly, and then act surprised when their subordinates do the same - as though employees are meant to greatful for their terrible treatment

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Does ring true dunnit?

        Sometimes people use “respect” to mean “treating someone like a person” and sometimes they use “respect” to mean “treating someone like an authority”

        and sometimes people who are used to being treated like an authority say “if you won’t respect me I won’t respect you” and they mean “if you won’t treat me like an authority I won’t treat you like a person”

        and they think they’re being fair but they aren’t, and it’s not okay.

    • ZeroTemp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I recently was recently reprimanded for using the term “subordinates”. I was informed that term has fallen out of favor. Direct Reports is the proper way to say it these days.

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Honestly calling someone a “direct report” sounds even more dehumanising. At least calling someone a “subordinate” acknowledges that you’re belittling their existence. A “direct report” sounds like a piece of paper.

  • NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    I refuse to install any work related software on my phone. Not only because I don’t want to be contacted after hours, but companies often “require” full read/write access on your device, so they can remotely wipe their data if you quit or get fired.

    Fuck that.

    • scrion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      This is absolutely correct. Heck, you’re free to deny that based on any reasoning, maybe the shoddy icon of the work app doesn’t match your phone wallpaper.

      The phone is your private property, if an employer requires an app to be installed to do your job, they can provide a phone.

      I would also never let corporate IT manage a device, e. g. a laptop connected to my private network at home.

      • Emerald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I would also never let corporate IT manage a device, e. g. a laptop connected to my private network at home.

        If you ever must, buy a new laptop. And use it on a guest wifi network. Use it as you would a work laptop, nothing personal on it

        • scrion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          No, have the company buy a laptop, and if necessary, also have them buy the hardware that allows for proper network separation, if not already available.

          Just another thing to be aware of.

            • scrion@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Surely not. But also many employees won’t even ask for it, and change will only happen if people care about it.

              So first, raise awareness, and naturally, implement those things at any companies you manage or own.

              I’m not saying quit your job and become homeless if your employer won’t corporate with you on the issue. Everyone should think about how this could potentially affect them and what they can do within the constraints they operate in, though.

              As someone else in this thread said, a separate (VLAN, guest) network for work devices, reasonable access rules etc. can go a long way. Eventually, I would like this to become unacceptable though.

    • InternetUser2012@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m with you there. My previous employer wanted a bunch of their shit on my phone. I asked if they were supplying me with a work a phone, and they said no, you already have one. I said I do, and it’s mine, and I’m not putting anything on it for work because work and home are going to be two different things. They gave me a work phone and then wanted to know why I turned it off in the parking lot before I even got into my car. I’m done working for the day sir.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        wanted to know why I turned it off in the parking lot before I even got into my car. I’m done working for the day sir.

        My co-worker locked his in his desk drawer when he went home for the night.

    • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      No modern MDM solution allows a company to access your personal data on BYOD. That’s why containerization of work profiles exist. Anything else would be a massive privacy scandal.

      Company-owned devices, though, do have that level of access when MDM enrolled.

  • krnl386@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    My guess is that some businesses get tax breaks from municipalities in exchange for filling office spaces with warm bodies. The idea is that people in office buildings support local businesses by buying lunch, and sometimes grabbing a pint after work.

    I’m not trying to excuse this trend, in fact as an IT person myself I 100% agree with the sentiment, I’m just trying to share what I’ve been told.

    • tinkling4938@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is the excuse my employer gave. So I’m to take a pay cut (gas, wear and tear on my vehicle, loss of time to commute) so I can spend more money to prop up other businesses for a tax break that is likely to go into some rich ass C-levels bonus or shareholders pocket for cut costs?

      Fuuuck that. Its just another way of picking the labor class clean to the bone.

    • gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Commercial realestste makes up a significant amount of rich people’s investment portfolios. And if people stopped needing office space the property would devalue and those rich people would lose easy money.

      So they have all collectively agreed to force their workers back to the office I order to keep the real estate values up and keep their investments positive.

      • pelerinli@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Also rich can afford to have a investment in busy city areas while regular folk can get a house in urban areas at best. And work from home is leading people to the urban areas where rents are less.

    • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s even simpler than that: they leased the office space and have to continue to pay that lease or else pay an early termination fee. This is basically the sunk cost fallacy. But you are right that sometimes additionally they get tax breaks for certain office space, for instance the San Francisco mid-market tax break (AKA the Twitter tax break)

    • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I have slack in it, because I don’t like walking around with two phones, but I have it configured to stop notifying after hours. Also worth noting that I do have a phone from the company, it’s just that I find it cumbersome to walk around with two phones.

    • icedterminal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      No matter what app it is, if employers require one to be used on a smartphone, they are legally obligated to provide you with a work phone. If they refuse, they are legally obligated to provide reimbursement for your personal mobile plan. This can be as simple as $5 or $10 added monthly to a paycheck, or as detailed as actual usage down to the kilobyte.

      Even if it’s as simple as clocking in and out. If they won’t provide a phone or reimburse, they must have some other method to complete the task. Whether it be a computer or paper. Failing that, they are not upholding the law of providing you tools necessary to complete your job. Which means if they terminate you for any of the above under “not able to do your job”, it is retaliation for you requiring them to do their job. You could potentially win a suit against them.

      • tourist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        My employer provides us with a “tech allowance” as a bonus every month

        It’s not enough to buy a barely functional work laptop, but you can “buy a laptop” through them, and then forfeit the bonus until it’s “paid off”

        I’m kinda awful with money, so I pretty much need every cent I can get. That bonus goes towards keeping my head above water in the debt trap I’m in.

        So my “work computer” which requires their spyware antivirus to be installed is a virtual machine. It’s been two years and no complaints so far. Great antivirus.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Right now I am on vacation, my work phone stays at home with an empty battery.

      They still have my private number if it is an absolute disaster at work and they need my help, but untill sunday evening I won’t even charge my work phone, let alone check it for messages/calls.

      Work apps stay on the work phone, the ONLY exception to that rule I will ever make is work MFA apps.

      But I’d sooner get a new separate phone for that if I don’t get a company phone.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Re MFA, I’ve been using a hardware key and it’s so much better. I don’t need my phone for a single work related thing anymore, so I can just ignore it until breaks.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s astonishing.

    The capitalists know full well we’re more productive working remotely, but their need for control has proven to be stronger than their insatiable greed anyway.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Just more proof that cruelty is the point. They’ve known since the 70s that they’d be richer than they are if they would pay thriving wages and eliminate poverty. They want the suffering more than the money.

      • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        They would be richer, but by “allowing” working class people to have a thriving life means the power gap between us and them wouldn’t be as big. People could organize and overthrow them, so they have to keep us fighting amongst ourselves for scraps.

        The cruelty is the point.

  • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    We have to call their bluff from time to time and remind the management that without us, none of their shit works. When we down tools its not like they can pick them up and get the show back on the road.

    • Taohumor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Kinda sad this is what it comes down to that they can’t be reasoned with like humans. I’d be looking for a new place to work.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      “I can grab any piece of shit off the street and replace you in 20 seconds.” Is what most of them think when it comes to meat machine labor like myself. :(

      • Soggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Individually? Maybe. That’s why worker solidarity is important. Let the bastard replace the whole team while you’re out front protesting shit pay and long hours.

  • olutukko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    in my country you’re not obligated to answer to anything work related after your work hours unless you’re manager or superior or it is exliciptly said in work contract that you be on call.

  • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Good way to get fired and have nothing for it. Pyrrhic victory. You better have an escape plan when you get fired.

    • Rekorse@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Some workplaces are so poorly run they dont even fire people clearly collecting paychecks.

      Ive literally seen management prevent someone from being fired for telling off a customer and swearing at them, because “we need them!”.

      • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        You go ahead and make that bet.

        IMO this is just employer revenge porn and would be almost overwhelmingly bad for the employees. Quit properly.

        • Rekorse@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Plenty of people are making that bet. Work from home is important to a lot of people and its not something you can take away without employees seeing it as a pay cut.

          So if my pay is being cut, and you are taking an extra 2 hours of my day in commute again, then I guess that becomes my reward for hard work?

          To be fair the dynamics do change from business to business. My current one is a good example of making poor decisions with workforce and not expecting the blowback.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    My previous workplace was like this. It didn’t get to this point, I left before it got to the point of being told you’re not allowed to wfh under any circumstances, but I was very confused why I needed to go to the office, to do my IT job, helping people with their computers remotely. I go to the office, to work remotely. Which doesn’t make any sense at all.

    What is special about the office that allows me to work better/faster/more effectively/whatever? Nobody could give me an answer. I can easily run the tools at home and work fine from there, but I’m not allowed.

    My specialty is in network operations, if they want my work to 100% go through their equipment and firewalls and stuff, I can make that happen. With little effort, I can setup a system on a VLAN, and VPN that VLAN to work, blocking it from all other traffic apart from the VPN. It would be the only system on that VLAN (apart from the firewall/VPN device), ensuring no possibility of cross contamination between my equipment and theirs. They even had an openVPN host already configured, which they would only need to generate a connection file for, in order for me to get it working. I can then proxy 100% of my traffic through an office system and it would be identical to being present in the office, apart from me being physically there.

    At home I have a dedicated room for my computer activities, where I can close the door and lock it if required, so I can remain undisturbed.

    I made sure they understood all of this but they still wanted me in the office at least 4 days a week. I’m still not sure why.

    I left that job, and my new job doesn’t even have a physical office, so I’m permanently working from home.

    • BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      They probably wanted to get rid of you. So instead of firing you, they imposed stupid rules to makes you leave on your own.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Oh probably. From everything I saw it was impossible for me to meet their demands.

        Partway through my employment I moved to a new home, after a few months my SO got a job. She doesn’t have a license but needed to travel about 15 minutes to work (30m round trip). I was basically the only person who could, or would, help her get to work. I worked 9-5, her shift was 2:30 to 10:30.

        For a while, my brother would drive her to work and I would drive her home, even that was stressful, because I’d wake up at 6:30 to shower and get ready to leave by 8AM so I can be at work for 9, then I had to stay up to bring her home, which she wasn’t out at 10:30 promptly every day, so I’d frequently get home after 11:30. Going to bed at, or after midnight, to wake up by 6:30 AM, five days a week isn’t fun, even at four days in the office per week, it was not great.

        Thought-out this time I was asking for more wfh, since then I can at least sleep from midnight to 8 AM or so. They wouldn’t budge.

        My brother ended up having a medical issue that caused him to be unable to drive her to work, so I told my employer I had to work from home, since I have to take care of getting her both to, and from work, and that, at most, the situation would last around 10-12 months (she was working on her driver’s license, and that’s the minimum waiting/learning time for new drivers, before they can drive without a chaperone); I also informed them that I could attend the office once per week, since she had one weekday off per week as part of her shift rotation. They “compromised” by basically telling me to follow their schedule or be laid off. Their schedule was: in office every day from 9-1. Travel home between 1 and 2pm, and do what’s needed to get my SO to work. Once I’m done that, I can work from home when I return from dropping her off (usually 2:30 or 3 PM to 5 PM or so… Whatever our quitting time was), with one day (her day off) fully in office, and one day fully from home. So 3 of 5 days was this insane in-office then drive home and finish at home thing, one day was fully remote, and one day was fully in office.

        Needless to say, I burned out fast. Got a note from my doctor saying I was disabled (he didn’t specify why, but if push came to shove it would be something mental health related, he never needed to AFAIK), and I wasn’t able to work right now, and currently the recovery time needed was unknown. So I went on disability.

        I also want to mention that through all the half day nonsense, they expected me to log 6.5 hours in their time tracking software, which is something I struggle with at the best of times. When I’m stressed, the first thing that suffers is my ability to correctly log and account for my time in any system. So I had 4 hours in the morning to work from the office on my “split days” (as I called them), plus, maybe 2.5 hours at most during my work from home time. Totalling 6.5 hours. I couldn’t so much as take a shit or I would fall behind on my time tracking. Normally over an 8 hour shift, the 1.5 hours of missing time in the day would be for breaks/lunch. It’s hard to take lunch when I’m barely able to make it home in an hour, and barely able to get to/from her work in 30 minutes. I usually work through lunch because I tend to have time where I have no idea what I was doing, so I can’t really account for it in the time tracker. With the 1.5 hour block of driving in the middle of my day, plus all the distractions and unaccounted time I know I’ll accrue from co-workers pulling me away from my work to ask asinine questions about things that don’t have a presence in the time tracking system (all ticket based, and they would ask me about prospective projects that wouldn’t have a ticket for months), I knew that what they were asking as an impossible task.

        After I felt up to the task of returning to that insanity, instead of keeping my seat warm for me, they laid me off before I was set to return to work. I only felt up to it because it would have only been a matter of a few months before my SO was able to take her driver’s test to be able to drive solo, and after 6 months of being off I wasn’t suicidal from the stress anymore, but the bills were starting to pile up.

        I was able to determine that they hired a new person in the same role I had, who was on probation at the time when I wanted to return.

        I’ll let you conclude what you want from that. I’ll legally bound not to speak poorly of the company, or what happened after my layoff. Everything I’ve said here is simply the facts of the matter.

        In any case, after some thought, I’m glad I don’t work with people who would force me into that kind of position for a paycheque. I have a new job now and I’m slowly paying off any accumulated bills from my time disabled and/or laid off. The new company, as I believe I’ve mentioned, is entirely wfh, and I’m certain if I ended up in a similar spot, they would be vastly more empathetic to my plight. I’m even earning a small amount more per year, not enough to write home about, but it’s still a bigger number than I was given at the last place. I’m happy where I am, and I’m largely not stressed, apart from the normal stresses of my job. I no longer need to pay for gas to get to the office, nor parking, since the previous job was located in a nearby city in the downtown area, with no free parking for employees, so I had to get paid public parking out of my own pocket. I estimate the change will save me around $6000/yr or more. On top of my small bump in pay, I should have a bit less than $10k/yr more money to myself. Right now all of that is sunk into repayments, but long term, its basically free money.

        • what_was_not_said@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          If you work in the US, NDAs tied to severance are generally illegal.

          Even so, I gave my last employer the benefit of silence for the amount of time my severance would have covered in regular salary. That time is now past.