• BrotherL0v3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Fun facts!

    85% of people arrested with fentanyl at the border as U.S. citizens.

    The vast majority of people arrested here for trafficking children are U.S. citizens (and children are over 3x more likely to be trafficked by an acquaintance or relative than they are a random kidnapper).

    “Illegal aliens” commit less crime than natural born U.S. citizens.

    Violent immigrants, perverted trans people, and incompetent DEI hires are all moral panics. You hear so much about them because the Republican party has nothing to offer that will make your life safer or easier.

  • cowfodder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Did this stupid mother fucker really refer to the Prime Minister of Canada as “governor”? Can’t tell if pushing the 51st state bullshit or he’s just that fucking dumb!

    • HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      He thinks speaking diminutively to people automatically puts him in a position of power over them

      It’s an insecurity issue common with bullying

      • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I wish people would start responding by referring to him as “washed up reality TV personality Trump”, or even better, “convinced felon Trump”

        It’s great because unlike “Governor Trudeau”, it’s actually true

    • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      He has been for a while now, which is actually a violation of the US’ nato obligations. But who care anymore, the US is no longer an ally.

      Edit: it also violates a ton of border treaties, and half a doze international agreements the US has benefited from for a long time. But just with NATO:

      Key points of the treaty

      • The parties agree to settle disputes peacefully
      • The parties agree to refrain from using force in a way that goes against the United Nations’ goals
      • The parties agree to consider an attack on one of them as an attack on all of them
      • The parties agree to consult about threats and defense matters
      • The parties agree to safeguard the freedom, common heritage, and civilization of their peoples
      • The parties agree to promote stability and well-being in the North Atlantic area

      Threatening Canada violates all of these and then some.

  • Alloi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    my assumption is that he wants a guy like that to assist in the operations of a new american run private cartel network, after they have ousted mexican cartels who cant be reasoned with to give up their profits to the US Oligarchs and private contract groups. they get a chance to install their own american run mexican cartel in mexico, and take over their drug trade for private funding operations. it would explain the 3000 troops they sent to the southern boarder, among other “official” reason.

    this guy will help them with connecting with private sellers, to private clients, and logistics. im also assuming that this “new silk road” will be heavily monitored under the guise of decentralization and privacy, for use in things like blackmail, and coercion of users. or simply to attack other drug trade networks by undermining their image and pricing.

    but what do i know? im just some guy in a bathtub.

    • Hochiiplox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      This tracks given his posts the other day about “the US beginning the crypto capital of the world”

      It’s all about to become some dark enlightenment bullshit

  • Anivia@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    As much as I hate Trump, I don’t think this is the “gotcha” it is being portraied as by this tweet. Silk Road was one of the best things to happen for the “safer use” movement of all time. The ability to not have to deal with shady street dealers and order from darknet suppliers on a platform that had legitimate reviews and an escrow system was a huge improvement to the safety of drugs users. It meant a much lower risk of contaminated drugs or getting scammed out of your money.

    Of course Ross allegedly also attempted to hire a hitman, which is how he got caught, cause the hitman was an undercover agent, so he allegedly is not a good guy regardless of how you think about him helping people get access to cleaner drugs, but that’s besides the point the author of the tweet is trying to make

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      People died from overdoses not to mention lots more ruined lives. I get you like the idea of drugs that are safer to order but that does not make it a good thing.

      Also lots of child pornography, murder for hire, human trafficking, and all kinds of other shitty things took place. So yeah, not exactly a good thing.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Decriminalised use/possession, for sure.

      But I always think the libertarian “just legalise all the drugs” is just odd.

      Regulated? So you mean preventing people from taking really stupid shit? Sounds great sign me up lol

      People gotta accept there are trade-offs to living in a society, and one of those is that there’s a limit to which we allow each other to get high. Because there are some drugs that make people aggressive, and I personally think these ought to be curtailed where possible. (Again, not a “war on drugs” style curtailment. But distribution, still illegal and criminal)

      You wanna take shit like meth? Cool, go out to the woods and never use socialised medicine where workers are at risk from people on such drugs, or just randoms walking down the street.

      I don’t think taking hard drugs should put you in prison, or even give you a criminal record, but actually legalising the distribution? Nah. Go live in the woods/hills away from everyone else.

      • s23b@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Because there are some drugs that make people aggressive, and I personally think these ought to be curtailed where possible. (Again, not a “war on drugs” style curtailment. But distribution, still illegal and criminal)

        The first such drug that comes to my mind is alcohol. Its distribution was also criminalized in the past, eventually leading to an increase in organized crime.

      • HalfSalesman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t know if Meth use should constitute total exile from society, especially if you are trying to get off of it. Its a highly addictive drug and usually people use it because of a state of being deprived and desperate of any joy in life.

        • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          This is a misunderstanding, apologies. I’m saying if you’re advocating complete legalisation of distribution of every single drug out there, then I’m using hyperbole to point out that this is too much “freedom to” without considering “freedom from”.

          I think all drug use should be decriminalised.

            • Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              I honestly never heard the term “tankie” before a few days ago. What is it? Extremist communists?

              • danciestlobster@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                That’s pretty much it, yeah. It’s worth noting, there is a lot of animosity on here, particularly from .world, for .ml and .hexbear instances. Both are heavily communist, far left communities, and get a bad rep because they are known for not accommodating liberal or other not as left viewpoints. This was particularly heated around the election with disagreements about voting for liberals vs protest voting.

                Fwiw I’m a strong believer if we are to organize against literal fascism we will need the liberal and the farther left to find enough common ground to work together. It’s a…work in progress on here.

                • nylo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  db0 (my instance and @Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com’ ) is a leftist anarchist instance and I’d say the animosity towards tankies is even stronger here.

                  it’s not anything to do with liberals vs leftists it’s that they handwave genocide and other atrocities as “western propaganda” and worship lennin and mao and stalin and north korea and so on and so forth.

  • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Pardoning Ulbricht is the incredibly thin silver lining of Trump’s presidency. These drug war advocates talk like they really believe this problem can be solved with criminal justice, meanwhile they defund harm reduction education and make healthcare inaccessible. It’s diabolical.

    • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ulbricht was a sack of shit. He tried to hire several hitmen to kill agents investigating his stuff. He isn’t someone you want to get behind.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        He tried to hire several hitmen federal agents to kill agents investigating his stuff.

        In Ross’ defense people should defend themselves from violent prohibitionists who lock encage, torture, and murder people.

        Prohibitionists are the true sacks of shit. Endlessly profiting from drugs and violence.

      • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        The war on drugs is not ethical and the very last people I will get behind are law enforcement. The case against Ulbricht was a tissue of lies and fabrication.

    • Professorozone@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I had never heard of him or the Silk Road. I just looked it up and it seems like there was some benefit to creating a place where people could find drugs without the dangerous human encounters that can happen during these sales but it also said that the site was used to trade in illegal weapons, hacking tools and tutorials, hit men for hire and other unlawful goods and services. Doesn’t sound like much of a silver lining to me. More like an aluminum lining.

      • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Would you trade in weapons or hacking tools? Those are societal problems and locking up a single person makes literally zero difference to that problem. The reality is that there are now many competing sites offering the same items and worse. The opioid crisis in America was created by literally one family, the Sackler’s, why aren’t they in prison? This is a justice system that behaves like a banana republic.

        • Professorozone@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Your agreement could be used for the crime of mass shootings. It’s a societal problem, what’s the use in locking up one person?

          I think if it’s true, he should be locked up AND the Sacklers right next to him.

          • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            This is a criminal justice system where penalties scale with skin colour and inversely with wealth. They got pissy with Ulbricht due to the sheer scale of the manhunt required to get one person, a vast sum was spent that could have been spent on healthcare and harm reduction. They don’t actually care about the damage that drugs do or rehabilitation, this is about punishment. Everyone needs to take responsibility for their actions, except wealthy white people.

  • iiinnnn@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Pardoning him was however a good thing, given price gouging regarding medications

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      What does that have to do with Ulbrecht??

      Edit: to be clear, darknet markets still exist, and never stopped existing. You don’t need to pardon someone convicted of attempted murder for this.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m going to guess there were prescription meds available on SR. The danger is, if they weren’t going through FDA or any oversight, it’s very possible they were some other “mix” containing addictive substances.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Sure, but darknet markets never stopped existing. You don’t need this one loser to be out of prison for these things to exist (and they probably function better without him)