• Sunflier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    23 minutes ago

    The Confederacy was in a state of rebellion too. He’s equated standing up to ICE with the Confederate’s bombing of Ft. Sumter.

  • itisileclerk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 hours ago

    ELI5, If Republicans in general don’t want federal control, they want de-regulation, then why they are supporting federal control of California?

    • Wolf@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      3 hours ago

      They are only against federal control when it’s them who are being controlled. They are fine with it happening to other people. It’s how they can claim to be pro freedom out of one side of their mouth and anti-freedom with the other. Laws for thee, none for me.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    So the trump administration is fully admitting that the insurrection attempting to block the certification of the Presidential election 2021 on Jan 6 was open rebellion?

    • AngrySquirrel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Holly shit. I hadn’t seen that last image you posted before. I didn’t realize the Jan 6 insurrectionist brought flexcuffs. That is quite disturbing. Who the fuck were they planing to kidnap or take hostage with those flexcuffs?

    • CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I know this is sarcasm but, sadly, they don’t. I have talked to a few of them. Some either say it is patriot8c and others said it didn’t happen.

      You can’t win

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        others said it didn’t happen.

        Who is it they acknowledge trump pardoned when he got into office? If it didn’t happen, then there as no one to pardon. Yet trump came out and gleefully pardoned the lot of them. If it was “antifa” that did it, why did trump pardon antifa?

        Keep in mind I’m not questioning you on this but them, and I know the mind of a MAGAt is finely tuned to support cognitive dissonance.

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They admit no such thing.

      “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” - Frank Wilhoit (not the political scientist who passed away in 2010, a younger one who is alive still).

  • vala@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Can California please just withhold taxes already and put this country out of its misery?

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Yep. Totally true. You are born, and the taxes are automatically deducted from your existence. There is no way for a state to change the amount paid, or to whom the taxes are paid. Absolutely impossible.

        • sparrownetwork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          35 minutes ago

          I’m all for CA residents paying their federal taxes to the state, but that’s going to require a lot of faith that the state will protect them from the feds.

  • conicalscientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    So is the red line crossed yet or is the goal post once again some indeterminate point in the future.

    History won’t tell the beginning of the Trump regime at that indeterminate point. It began when he rode down that piss yellow escalator.

    • massacre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      " In addition, the Secretary of Defense may employ any other members of the regular Armed Forces as necessary to augment and support the protection of Federal functions and property in any number determined appropriate in his discretion." 100% illegal according to Posse Comitatus Act.

      Deploying Marines, Space Force, Navy Army or Airforce in the US against the US is prohibited

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Minor nitpick: national guard soldiers under title 32 is totally fine (the George Floyd protests), however that requires the state governor’s approval. Trump bypassed that by putting them on title 10 orders which is active duty. Those are typically only for training or overseas deployment, and not for actual deployment within the US (though I think the south border mission may be an exception).

        So, he’s already violating the law, but also putting provisions to use active duty soldiers as well which is double against the law.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I wonder now what my ex-housemate thinks of Trump. He is one of those centrist types who thinks excessive power from one side needs to be counteracted by the other, but mostly pay lip service to the right. He dislikes the right in his country which ruled for 13 years and voted centre left, but supports Trump and right wing parties in Europe because of too much immigration in the West. But at the same time, he supports Palestine. My ex-housemate means well for the most part, but he is one of those men who are vulnerable to disinformation.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      He dislikes the right in his country which ruled for 13 years and voted centre left, but supports Trump and right wing parties in Europe because of too much immigration in the West

      If feels like you’re burying the lede here.

      “In his country” suggests he’s an immigrant. This means he too, is an immigrant right? How does he resolve this hypocrisy? Or when he says “too much immigration in the West” is he just a racist and is referring to people with different color skin?

      • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        “In his country” suggests he’s an immigrant. This means he too, is an immigrant right? How does he resolve this hypocrisy?

        Duh, because he’s one of the good immigrants.

        • Bravo@eviltoast.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          To be fair, there are two different kinds of immigration: legal and illegal. Some (not all, but some) immigrants who came via the proper legal channels resent those who didn’t, and of those who feel that way, some feel that way for selfish “screw you, I got mine” reasons and others feel that way for genuine reasons, such as the fact that supporting illegal immigration is, to a certain extent, supporting the human trafficking and drug trafficking that goes hand-in-hand with it. Borders do serve a purpose and believing that illegal immigration should be curtailed isn’t necessarily a hypocritical position for an immigrant.

          HOWEVER, that isn’t to say that ICE is the answer.

      • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Or the person you’re replying to, talking about an EX-house mate is the the immigrant. You’re reading suggestions that aren’t there.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          There are two possible scenarios for who is the immigrant. Both of them make the ex-housemate look like an asshole.

          The other that you’re referring to would mean the housemate was complaining about OP, as OP was the immigrant that he says there is too much of. I mean its possible, but I wouldn’t expect OP to then say “My ex-housemate means well for the most part”.

          • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            52 seconds ago

            We are both immigrants. But my ex-housemate is Eastern European while I am of Asian origin but I grew up in the West.

            My ex-housemate is nice and helped me a lot before. But I don’t know if you are aware of the stereotype about Eastern Europeans that they can be xenophobic. The only diversity they have is with fellow white Eastern Europeans with different ethnicities and speaking different languages. They tend to misunderstand why the West is more welcoming of non-white immigrants (I don’t have to mention the West having had a globe spanning empire before which explains why). So, my ex-housemate exhibit some xenophobia. I am mentioning the term lightly because IMO xenophobia is one level lower than racism, which I see more as hateful and purposeful. I know some people who express xenophobia are tolerant to foreigners but seems to draw a line that “there are too many” (as if we can control where people want to go; and it is climate change, illegal invasions and wealth inequality are what cause mass migration). My ex-housemate express similar sentiment but afraid coming off as racist in all occasions.

            I am neither disparaging or excusing my ex-housemate, but IMO being a lonely, single man made him go into the right wing rabbit hole, perhaps unintentionally, considering he does a lot of exercise and fitness. Unfortunately, the right co-opted the health and wellbeing improvement to groom many people, both men and women. It leads confusion to many people’s heads who are not quite fully on board.

  • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Microwave dispersal cannons can be blocked by a large poster covered in aluminum foil. Just be sure to attach it to a wood stake.

    Sound cannons are loud enough to work through strong ear protection, but sound waves are still air pressure pulses. You can disrupt the flow of the pulse with a solid enough curved shield.

    If necessary, storm matchs have their own oxidizer. You can light it and wind won’t put it out. Styrofoam and gasoline is sticky. Use that information however you want

    Do not use a belt to stop blood flow. Get some proper tournequtes (I don’t remember how to spell it). Slide it on, and turn it until the bleed stops. If you think it’s too tight, turn it some more.

    Edit: most military vehicles are diesel fueled. They are pretty thirsty, so be sure to share water with them. Right in the fuel tank is good enough.

    • LuigiMaoFrance@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      microwave canons

      I did not know about these, but some quick searches suggest that they pose a major threat to people’s eyesight as they can boil your retina before you really feel anything when used at a low strength.

      Messed up these are used at protests, fuck these fascists.

      • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Eh, from what I’ve watched “low strength” is still quick enough to trigger people to scatter.

        Remember, it obeys r squared, so if they use it and want it to be effective at distance, they can’t reduce the strength a lot.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Do not use a belt to stop blood flow. Get some proper tournequtes (I don’t remember how to spell it). Slide it on, and turn it until the bleed stops. If you think it’s too tight, turn it some more.

      If you’re worried about blood loss, there are some online resources for how to do first aid. I think https://www.stopthebleed.org/training/ was recommended last time this came up.

      I read you need to be careful with tourniquets, because they’re quite painful and if used inappropriately can cause long term damage. Used appropriately they can save a life, but you don’t want them to be the first tool you reach for.

      • Soggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Long-term damage is only really a danger after a couple hours in a proper tourniquet. Something makeshift in order to survive to a hospital is always fine. It’s like CPR: breaking ribs is a small cost to pay for survival.

        • twice_hatch@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 minutes ago

          Yeah I think either DeviantOllam or Tacticool Girlfriend on YouTube says 2 hours. It might be in Ollam’s “Passport. Lawyer. Locksmith. Gun.” talk. Unfortunately I don’t have that info indexed yet.

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      8 hours ago

      If you curve the aluminium foil somehow, you can actually refelct it back. They did tests on youtube where they used a flipped riot shield and it work.

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Sounds like you could make a curved protest sign with plywood and then hide some foil between the plywood and a paper/cardboard layer for a fairly inconspicuous shield that can block and even reflect both microwave and sound cannons.

    • black0ut@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Sound cannons are actually pretty weird, in that they don’t work like you’d imagine them to work. They produce sound when multiple beams of ultrasound collide with an object, so if they’re pointed at you, you’re the one producing the sound that hurts you. That’s why they’re so effective.

      Some people online have done some tests, and thin cardboard appears to be the best way to stop them. Put the thin cardboard before you, and it stops most of the sound. It can be the cardboard from a poster, if you have one.

      Ear protection headphones (for workshops) also help, and their effectiveness is enhanced further by wearing small earplugs inside. Active noise cancelling headphones don’t help and can even be counter productive, so don’t use those.

      • Natanael@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 hours ago

        To be a little more pedantic, they send ultrasound frequencies and they “degrade” into regular audible sound waves when they collide with something (combination of harmonic effects and destructive / constructive interference). The reason they send ultrasound instead of using regular directional speakers is because it’s smaller wavelength is easier to aim so much more of the energy moves forwards, so you don’t hear much noise coming from the source itself.

        That’s why they work for “crowd control”. A strong enough regular speaker would bother the operator too much.

      • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The noise cancelling part was particularly fascinating. Not only was it ineffective, it amplified the sound. I think its because noise cancelling circuitry relies on the ability to create a signal frequency that cancels out the initial waveform. That’s all well and good, but I think the sound cannons use separate speakers out of phase. Since the noise cancelling headphones produce a signal in phase with the first frequency detected, the microsecond slight delay causes it to be added to a subsequent phase boosting the power.

    • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Would hearing protection that electronically filters sound be able to cancel out sonic cannons?

      • muusemuuse@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 hours ago

        You cannot electronically filter out sound. That’s not what they do. They just emit the same sound they hear in the opposing phase. This is risky with sonic weapons.

  • spirinolas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Calling it…Trump declares California to be in rebellion and suspends their votes in the electoral college and congress in the next elections.

    • Bacano@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The government in general is crumbling and it’s corrupt “leaders” will need to ramp up authoritarianism as the constituents begin to question it’s legitimacy.

      They’ll make use of dissenters by putting them in work camps, easing the need for cheap labor, and allowing the remaining population a chance at hiding from their duty to protect constitutional rights by continuing to provide material comforts.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    180
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    This is the language from the law that would permit the President to mobilize National Guard troops in a state without its Governor’s consent.

    Edited to add: found the law here, it’s small and easy to read: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-title10/html/USCODE-2011-title10-subtitleE-partII-chap1211-sec12406.htm

    If it is invoked, it says:

    Orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States

    But I parse that “shall” to mean the Governor is forced to comply.

        • Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Honestly one of the coolest moments in US history.

          I feel like the destruction of the image of the United States is in full swing.

          • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 hours ago

            The image of the United States was destroyed twenty years ago. It became irreparable in 2016. What’s happening now is, since Trump has destroyed all of America’s diplomatic and economic leverage, we can finally be honest about what we think of you.

            • Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              While semantically I have issues with what you said, they’re not important. Overall, I agree with you. One thing I think the important take away should be the reasons I hate America is because it could be so much better. Not every American is blindly patriotic.

              I cannot stress the so much better part enough.

            • possumparty@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Don’t worry, we agree, this is authoritarian imperialist colonizing shithole just like it always has been. Fascism isn’t new to America, this country was built on genocide and slavery, it’s a fucking cesspool.

          • DandomRude@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            That’s true. However, I’m afraid that the current regime is not only working to destroy the image of the United States, but to destroy what remains of democracy.

            It seems that Drump and his henchmen will stop at nothing to establish a fascist state. I think the administration’s actions as a whole point strongly in that direction.

    • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Would be interesting if there is a way that people on the right actually join the left on this since this is the thing the right armed themselves for

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        55
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The pattern I see is that most on “the right” here will not be able to break out of their disinformation bubble unless it affects them personally. So only the small portion who have seen someone they know (“one of the good ones”) harassed by ICE will respond.

        • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          That’s true. But I think we’re closer than ever to that break. The instinct of people on the left is to always rub a dogs nose in shit after it craps on the carpet. But we all know there’s better ways.

          If people on the left create some bridges here and create awareness this could shift perspectives. There are lots of people on the right and left who will never be swayed on anything. But there’s a lot of people who can be. Especially over this stuff.

          It gets harder and harder for trumpets to support him and this could be a bridge to far. So many right wing people’s core fear is Government doing this very thing. This might supersede their trump honeymoon

          • Sanctus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            The disinformation bubble is tighter than a noose. They dont even know any of this is happening. An entire portion of the populace lulled into unconscious compliance by the state propaganda apparatus. There is no honeymoon stage, these people are lobotomized and sustained intravenously.

          • dhork@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            10 hours ago

            I’d love it if you were right, and this is what breaks Trump’s stranglehold on the electorate. but the advantage Trump and his friends have is that they have no shame, and lie with impunity. Those lies are attractive. Even now, I am reading that Trump released a statement saying that the troops are quelling the unrest in LA, while the Mayor says no troops have arrived. Which do you think folks in the Conservative Cinematic Universe believe?

            It’s hard to break these folks out of their bubble when the side pushing the bubble can lie without consequences. Their opposition has the burden of logical consistency to overcome.

            • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              9 hours ago

              I think we just need to make more content. I feel we really under estimate memes and jokes as a way to get them to see how fucked things are. Its such a stupid idea but being able to quickly convey a message through a photo that can express an entire view point is really powerful. Nobody reads walls of text anymore. But the left seem to think we all need to win arguments online or its all pointless.

              Seeing the internet flooded with artists drawing ICE patrols as Brown shirts and Trump as a devil will do more in a day then any leftist showing up to any protest.

              • HorseTesselator@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                9 hours ago

                I think that, specifically, National Guardsmen and LEOs should be reminded that ICE’s game is to deflect outrage onto them. The Burger Team Weekend Commandos rush into stores and restaurants, wreck shop, abduct people, piss off the locals, incite unrest, and then run like pants-shitting cowards behind the NG and the Police while they clean up the mess and take the heat. Even worse, their service is a matter of public record, while ICE gets to hide behind masks. The double-standard is disgusting and I’m surprised more people aren’t pointing it out. Their jobs are being made so, so, so much harder than they already are because of how it continues to erode public trust.

                Most likely, the NG is going to stand around on street corners while chasing ICE around town wiping their ass for them. Personally, I doubt most are happy about this arrangement.

                For the record, I’m not a fan of cops or the military in principle. But I know if I was in their position as a peacekeeper I would be beyond furious at what the feds are doing. Keep in mind, they’re human too. Part of the game is to get everyone to hate each other for bullshit reasons.

                • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  I bet a lot are frustrated for what you just said.

                  The military is to protect all in the country. This thing where they pit the military against half the country is something that isn’t lost on the military. It makes it that much harder for them to do their job.

              • dhork@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Walz hit a nerve when he called them all weird. Because they are! We don’t need to double down on memes, but we do need to explain, in simple terms, why Trumpism is so awful.

                And I don’t say “simple” because people are dumb, I say it because people are busy and don’t always have time to think things through.

                • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  You’re absolutely wrong. Subtle visual media is far more powerful than any direct argument. Just watch the debate between Ken Ham and Bill Nye it’s a perfect example. You can’t just tell someone they’re wrong and expect them to change their mind. People need to arrive at their own realizations.

                  That’s why creating content matters. We don’t engage with content the same way we do with people we consume it, reflect (often subconsciously), and move on. But over time, with enough content, those messages start to shape opinions. This shift will never happen if we rely solely on “facts and logic” to win arguments. People simply don’t operate that way.

                  At this point, after decades of the internet, it’s ignorant to think otherwise. We should all know better but somehow, we still don’t.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        They won’t.

        All of their rhetoric is bullshit to obscure the fact that they hate brown people, queer people, people who aren’t their religion, just anyone they’re angry at, really.

        It really is that simple.

        They’ll believe, to some extent, what they are saying, they’ll tie themselves up in knots, but ultimately, they’ll default to anything that allows them to laugh when people they think they are better than are made to suffer.

        The few that manage to resolve the cognitive dissonance and realize they are in fact hateful bigots, and that… that is bad?

        At that moment, they are no longer right wing.

      • mriguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        since this is the thing the right armed themselves for

        No it isn’t and it never was. That was the excuse they used to cover their gun fetish. They always saw themselves as the shock troops of the authoritarian takeover, and the fact that they are delighted it’s happening is confirmation.

        • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Disagree heavily. The right is a big umbrella term just like the left. I would put good money on it that a few groups are calling each other up and talking about this. I bet there will be big efforts to suppress this online.

      • Infinite@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I thought the next step was to dissolve the Senate and have the local governors use fear to keep us in line…

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        That is a lot harder to do, within the bounds of the law at least.

        Ironically, though, California is one of a small handful of states that allow for recall elections of all elected office holders, up to and including the Governor. Recall that Arnold Schwarzenegger became Governer there due to a recall election. So if his goal is to start ejecting Governors he doesn’t like, California is a good place to start.

        But Newsom has already survived one recall attempt, and since he seems to be the Next One Up for Democrats to nominate in 2028, Trump may not be eager to run a recall campaign that might lose, because Newsom will remind everyone that he “beat Trump” on the campaign trail. (And there is no guarantee that Musk won’t start tossing money at Newsom, who is enough of a schemer to accept it.)

        • entwine413@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          8 hours ago

          within the bounds of the law at least.

          Anything after this line is a moot point. They’re not operating within the bounds of the law.

          • dhork@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            8 hours ago

            This might be one area where our layered system of government is an advantage, though, because State governments have real power that is separate from the Federal Government. The Founders valued this, too: the 10th Amendment in the Bill of Rights explicitly says that any power not explicitly delegated to the Federal government belongs to the States (and to the people).

            So even this President, who aims to rule as a dictator, can’t exercise every power unless the States roll over and let him. And say what you will about Newsom and his pivot to the Right, but he will not roll over for Trump, nor will other Democratic governors.

            Other democracies devolved into Dictatorship because the dictator effectively captured all the levera of government. Here, that is extremely hard. Even after capturing Congress and (mostly) the Supreme Court, he still doesnt have it all.