• Taokan@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Everyone wants to run a subscription service, until they have everyone on a subscription. Then instead of celebrating that they won capitalism, they go and start with the exclusive extra addons and upgrades. Because unfortunately no company in the history of companies has ever said that’s it, we’re making enough money, let’s relax.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      6 hours ago

      actually, plenty of companies say exactly that.

      The thing is, they’re small privately owned companies. not giant corporations.

  • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 hours ago

    That’s only if it’s an older movie. The latest Captain America is available to rent for $25, or to buy for $30.

    Or you can do what I did, and sail the high seas for it.

    • HipHoboHarold@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yeah, I kind of laughed at that. I wouldnt be surpised if even older movies cost a bit more now. But even renting a new movie is way too expensive now.

      • swampdownloader@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        They are out there and of varying quality. If only db0 had a good place to source, but c/piracy is very anti paid piracy (oxymoron I know) but sometimes convenience is worth a few $$ for non 1337 haxx0rz in the real world

        • Oka@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 minutes ago

          I pay for a seed box, basically just a middleman between torrents and myself, just so my ISP can back off

  • Artyom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    11 hours ago

    There was a time when almost everything was on Netflix. As a consumer, having all my content in one place for $10/mo is awesome, but according to capitalism, it is a problem that needed to be fixed.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The part that’s wildest to me is that nowadays with all the ways services are trying extract more value from their users (ads, increasing rates, reducing library size, restricting access to features, etc ) plus the DRM, the media consumption experience of just having the media files is so much better than the experience one can have through most of the streaming services or even DVDs with all of the unstoppable prerolls

      Whether you rip your own DVDs (legally murky) or you’re just watching a bunch of public domain silent films, or pirating, it’s really hard to beat just having the .mkv and opening it in your player of choice.

      About the only way to compete with that is one decent service with good quality, no ads, an extremely wide collection and minimally invasive DRM

      • DrainKikoLake@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Every time I head to the second-hand store I pick up a couple new CDs and DVDs. It’s great! I’m paying max $3.99 apiece and I’ll own them forever.

    • Landless2029@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The crazy thing is loads of people stopped pirating and paid for a streaming service that was affordable, worked, met thier needs.

      Now it’s all splintered with corporations wanting a piece of the pie.

    • FrChazzz@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Movies were on Netflix, TV shows were on Hulu. It was great.

      Once Netflix started on their whole “half of all our offerings are going to be original content” is when it began to go downhill. Literally no one (aside from executives) was sitting around going “man, I can’t wait until Netflix starts making shows and movies!” They were a service. That’s all they ever needed to be.

      • illegible@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I think they were forced into it when the other companies decided they could make some of that sweet netflix money, so they stopped licensing to netflix and built their own services. Netflix had no choice but to build their own content.

      • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Idk I know I was pretty excited for Netflix’s early original content because the proposition was like “HBO, but on the internet and you can watch it any time” and they were doing big budget stuff. Things only went south when they didn’t keep up the HBO level quality and ruined their reputation to the point where I see “Netflix original” and immediately think “garbage TV”

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It really did hurt my ressources for pirating though. After not downloading anything for years, finding the right sites and proxies again was hard.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Except that the technology has improved and now Sonarr and radarr take all effort out of the equation.

  • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Or even better, “even though you pay for the ad free subscription, this video is only available with ads”.

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Was showing the inlaws the bingie skin i’d been setting up…they explicitly said this subscription shit was becoming unmanageable and they were seriously considering setting sail