• RedFrank24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Valhalla isn’t a reward though, it’s a hell for those that don’t enjoy battle. Here’s what happens in Valhalla:

    • You equip your armor and weapons
    • You walk out into the courtyard
    • You kill eachother
    • You are resurrected
    • You go to dinner
    • You equip your armor and weapons
    • You walk out into the courtyard
    • You kill eachother

    etc. etc.

    It is NOT a reward. Valhalla is not heaven, it is a place that Odin puts his very specific chosen warriors that died a violent death in battle. Whether you go to Valhalla doesn’t depend on you being either a good or bad person, only how you died. Odin himself will even actively intervene and make sure you lose your fight and die in battle, just because he wants you as one of his Einherjar.

    Valhalla being portrayed as this big reward for good people is a bastardised version brought in by Christians.

    • BogeyTheSwear@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Valhalla is not a punishment though, as only real warriors (read: most likely this will be people who love battle) will be granted access.

      Therefore, Valhalla is a reward yes. Just not for “being a good person”, but Odin still decided who the real warriors were.

      No Nazis would be considered real warriors. They are cowards by nature.

      • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        6 hours ago

        OP didn’t include this, but the whole point of Valhalla is that it’s a training facility for Ragnarok. Odin is gathering the fiercest warriors to fight at the end of the world.

        Also, it’s possible (likely?) that Norse warriors actually really wanted to go to Valhalla. Their values system was different to ours, and a place where you get to fight (gain honor) and feast with your friends every day probably sounded pretty good to them.

        • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Man Valhalla must suck extra. It’s like being a toddler and playing soccer with the grown-ups.

          Imagine thinking you will be the elite warrior hero but then WW2 plane pilots and tank operators that died during battle show up.

          • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Entrance to Valhalla doesn’t depend on your killstreak. It’s more about your warrior spirit. The Norse likely would have respected warriors who fought against equal or stronger enemies more than those who cowardly fought against weaker foes. Remember, the battle for Ragnarok will be against titanic monsters and giants. The Norse believed they would be the underdogs in that fight.

            For instance, I doubt remote drone operators would qualify, although your example of WW2 tank and plane crew definitely could.

            • CPMSP@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Absolutely! Also why Berserkers were a thing - to charge into battle with a weapon in each hand and no defense showed their spirit like not much else could.

              So that they could join the immortal dead and live on as legend while they feast and prepare with Thor for the end times.

  • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    As someone who has a lot of Nordic tattoos it sucks that I’m lumped in with these Nazi fucks at a glance.

    I’m an atheistic pagan and I fucking hate Nazis or really just bigots in general but I get treated like one by most people.

    • eronth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      A potential solution is to mix in with some very obviously anti-nazi tats. You can either go directly for anti-nazi, or just heavily indicated by virtue of anti-nazi tattoos (e.g. something obviously pro-lgbt would help dissuade assumptions of Nazi affiliation.)

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yeah. I got into all the nordic stuff 30 years ago when being a nazi wasn’t socially acceptable. So sad to all of them being out and coopting our cool aesthetics

  • Taalnazi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    FYI might be worth putting up a NSFW spoiler tag. That said, historically accurate meme woohoo!

    Seiðr, feminine one included, was practised by Odin, and vǫlvas, which were almost always women, had enormous respect. Priesthood was primarily a female affair, but I wouldn’t be surprised if mingling occurred.

    A myth is that “effeminacy” in those cultures is frowned upon; instead, it is a lack of courage, to be yourself, that the earlier Germanic cultures derided heavily.

    And so, Thor dressing as a gal, and Loki transforming into one, is actually super brave. The sages describe it more humorously, even, rather than insultingly.

    • Frostbeard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Loke also transformed into a mare, had sex with a stallion and gave birth to Sleipner. (I use my native Norwegian names on the stuff from Norse mythology)

      From wiki: "However, Loki had “such dealings” with Svaðilfari that “somewhat later” Loki gave birth to a grey foal with eight legs; the horse Sleipnir, “the best horse among gods and men.”

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    11 hours ago

    i like the “no Nazis in Valhalla” phrase because Valhalla is an idea, not a real thing. but let’s not pretend vikings were good people just to spite Nazis. you’re just doing the same mythologizing.

    • mastertigurius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      They were people. There were good ones and bad ones. Some might help with the laundry, some might blow a gasket for being reminded to clean up after dinner, some would be cried over and missed because they went out to sea and never came home. Generalising any culture or group in one direction or the other isn’t encouraging informed discussion. Nazis, however, are unequivocally bad, 'mkay?

    • cryptiod137@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Aryan meant Indo-European until the mustache man co-opted the term to mean blonde hair and blue eyes.

    • The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yeah, a lot of people seem to forget what raiding and pillaging involves, especially during that time. I hate when people try to romanticize that crap. It’s like if 1000 years from now someone tried to romanticize Nazis or Russian soldiers.

      • eronth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It’s like if 1000 years from now someone tried to romanticize Nazis or Russian soldiers.

        And they will. It’s such a bummer knowing they’ll turn into some trope-y aggressive dorks or something.

      • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Even just regular war was awful before industrialization. Marching armies basically depleted every place they went through of resources, because for a long time there was just no other way to operate. And that means that the people whose food was just taken might starve in the near future.

        And that’s if the army was nice, rape and pillaging of money and any valuable goods was also very common, even when the army was still marching within the area it was supposed to protect from invasion.

        War isn’t nice nowadays, either, but it’s at least possible to arrive at a war theater without destroying every place on the way, too.

        • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Except not really? Even in the source you linked, what was disapproved was being fucked by another man, but fucking a man wasn’t a problem. That’a not an exceptional view, the Romans had the same perspective. So the meme stands

            • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Ok? I’m not saying they weren’t homophobic, I’m saying their specific flavor of homophobia wouldn’t clash with the depiction in that specific meme

              • Ginny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Pagan Viking views on sexuality were more akin to pagan Roman views, it’s true (though arguably more extreme; Julius Caesar was called “every woman’s man and every man’s woman” and “the Queen of Bithynia” in his day, and so far as we know he never got to kill anyone over it). By the end of the end of the Viking age, post Christianisation, that may have been more or less true. But either way, it’s safe to say that the Vikings would not approve of a relationship between two men.

                The meme certainly suggests without any other context that the Vikings would disapprove of homophobia, and that seems to me to just not be the case.

              • kadotux@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                To exclusively top and to disapprove being fucked are two separate things

              • The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                9 hours ago

                It’s homophobic to look down on someone for being a bottom. How is this hard to understand? It’s nothing new either, it’s something that’s been around for a while and which is part of macho and homophobic culture. You can see that in prison rape/culture as well. No one questions your manliness if you’re the top, but if you’re a bottom you get called the bitch.

      • Berengaria_of_Navarre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        12 hours ago

        So are modern Scandinavians. Also I’m not so sure about gen alpha Norwegians. There are a large number of half Thai kids in rural areas. Norwegian women escape the villages to go live in Bergen/Oslo and the men who stayed home to take care of the family farm go over to Thailand to find someone. It’s a stereotype but it definitely happens pretty frequently.

        Also there’s a large foreign population generally (the oil industry and service industry attracts a lot of foreigners and Norway takes a fair number of refugees) æand they’re (relatively) well integrated (this doesn’t apply to Sweden). You actually see some Muslim women in Norwegian national dress with a headscarf that’s embroidered with the same pattern, which is cool.

    • Leon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Makes sense. They traveled a lot. Nowadays we’re all looking out our peepholes so we can ensure that we don’t run into neighbours.

    • Berengaria_of_Navarre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Yes but the neonazis use actual Norse pagan symbolism, which means you can’t use Norse themed jewelry without people thinking you’re a fascist. 😠

        • Berengaria_of_Navarre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          No more so than any other military force of the same era. Are you going to boycott ren fairies for the same reason? Sometimes people just like to dress up in traditional jewelry because it looks pretty.

          • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            The person I replied to was talking about jewelry. Are you wearing a necklace with ar-15 and screaming child pendants on it?

            • hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              54 minutes ago

              The American equivalent here would be wearing a necklace decipting a bald eagle or some symbol prevalent in American culture.

              • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Why do you keep talking about writing? The discussion is about jewelry. What does their jewelry have to do with raping and enslaving people? Same thing wearing a swastika has to do with gassing 6 million people and trying to conquer europe

                • renzhexiangjiao@piefed.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  not quite. you seem to be able to distinguish the american culture from gun violence in schools, rightfully saying that you’d have to wear a necklace shaped like a gun for it to be a condonation of gun violence. But you don’t make that distinction when it comes to norse culture and raping and enslaving people. And no, it’s not the same thing as swastikas, as swastikas were appropriated by the nazis, also nazis are not a culture. It would be like saying that wearing anything pertaining to the German culture makes you a Holocaust apologist.

          • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            In Germany, the distinction seems to be that Nazis might get away with homosexuality (e.g. Alice Weidel, one of the AfD party leaders, is a lesbian women), but they don’t consider themselves part of the LGBT+ community and thus won’t fly the usual pride flags.

  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Nooooo you’re ruining my pseudohistorical narrative!!! REEEEE SOMBODY GET ME MY AMPHETAMINES